These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24921852)

  • 1. Obese patients report modest weight loss after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a study from the Swedish spine register.
    Knutsson B; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(20):1725-30. PubMed ID: 24921852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Obesity is associated with inferior results after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a study of 2633 patients from the Swedish spine register.
    Knutsson B; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 22941097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of pain sensitivity on surgical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Lee JI; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Ruscheweyh R; Kang SS; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25384051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does Obesity Affect Outcomes After Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis? A Multicenter, Observational, Registry-Based Study.
    Giannadakis C; Nerland US; Solheim O; Jakola AS; Gulati M; Weber C; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1227-34. PubMed ID: 26100169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient are satisfied one year after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Paulsen RT; Bouknaitir JB; Fruensgaard S; Carreron L; Andersen M
    Dan Med J; 2016 Nov; 63(11):. PubMed ID: 27808037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No Benefit with Preservation of Midline Structures in Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Results From the National Swedish Spine Registry 2-Year Post-Op.
    Elmqvist E; Lindhagen L; Försth P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Apr; 47(7):531-538. PubMed ID: 34923549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting clinical outcome and length of sick leave after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in Sweden: a multi-register evaluation.
    Iderberg H; Willers C; Borgström F; Hedlund R; Hägg O; Möller H; Ornstein E; Sandén B; Stalberg H; Torevall-Larsson H; Tullberg T; Fritzell P
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1423-1432. PubMed ID: 30511244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Mendenhall SK; Zuckerman SL; Shau DN; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 24785973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Change in pain catastrophizing in patients with lumbar spinal surgery.
    Kim HJ; Kwon OH; Chang BS; Lee CK; Chun HJ; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):115-121. PubMed ID: 28669860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective national spine registry observational study.
    Alhaug OK; Dolatowski FC; Solberg TK; Lønne G
    Spine J; 2021 Sep; 21(9):1489-1496. PubMed ID: 33848690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis-associated radiculopathy.
    Parker SL; Fulchiero EC; Davis BJ; Adogwa O; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):705-11. PubMed ID: 21641874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of patient global assessment in lumbar spine surgery: an evaluation based on more than 90,000 patients.
    Parai C; Hägg O; Lind B; Brisby H
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Mar; 27(3):554-563. PubMed ID: 29058135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis.
    Urban-Baeza A; Zárate-Kalfópulos B; Romero-Vargas S; Obil-Chavarría C; Brenes-Rojas L; Reyes-Sánchez A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 25380536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Body Mass Index and Risk for Clinical Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Cohort Study.
    Knutsson B; Sandén B; Sjödén G; Järvholm B; Michaëlsson K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Sep; 40(18):1451-6. PubMed ID: 26165225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative pain pattern predicts surgical outcome more than type of surgery in patients with central spinal stenosis without concomitant spondylolisthesis: a register study of 9051 patients.
    Sigmundsson FG; Jönsson B; Strömqvist B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(3):E199-210. PubMed ID: 24173017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.