These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24922977)

  • 1. The author responds.
    Schiska A
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(5):588. PubMed ID: 24922977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The value of constructing a digital technique chart.
    Schiska A
    Radiol Technol; 2013; 85(2):236-7. PubMed ID: 24255152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Articles strike a chord: a closer look.
    Verschuuren AT
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(5):587. PubMed ID: 24806067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The author responds.
    Wood BD
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(5):587. PubMed ID: 24922978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining air kerma from pixel values in digital mammography.
    Toroi P; Nieminen MT; Tenkanen-Rautakoski P; Varjonen M
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3865-79. PubMed ID: 19491454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forward projection of variable angle imaging geometry to reduce reconstruction uncertainty and simplify seed matching in a backprojection algorithm.
    Meyer T; Kay I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4595-604. PubMed ID: 19567943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of operator-selected image noise index and reconstruction slice thickness on patient radiation dose in 64-MDCT.
    Kanal KM; Stewart BK; Kolokythas O; Shuman WP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):219-25. PubMed ID: 17579174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of nonlinear three-dimensional optimized reconstruction algorithm filter on image quality and radiation dose: validation on phantoms.
    Bai M; Chen J; Raupach R; Suess C; Tao Y; Peng M
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 19235377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance (QA) procedures for software: evaluation of an ADC quality system.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Benekos O; Molfetas M; Charou E; Kottou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16464840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and application of programs to measure modulation transfer function, noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency.
    Padgett R; Kotre CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16461517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The benefit of accounting for DQE variations in simulated dose reduction of digital radiographic systems.
    Svalkvist A; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):57-61. PubMed ID: 20176729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the dosimetric effect and reduction of inverse consistency and transitivity errors in deformable image registration for dose accumulation.
    Bender ET; Hardcastle N; Tomé WA
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):272-80. PubMed ID: 22225297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exact calculation of the minimal exposure for the secure detection of a transmission contrast signal.
    Schöfer FH; Hoeschen C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):81-5. PubMed ID: 20185455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of an automatic dose control system for CT: patient studies.
    Stumpp P; Gosch D; Kühn A; Sorge I; Weber D; Lehmkuhl L; Kahn T; Nagel HD
    Rofo; 2013 Feb; 185(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 23108902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient radiation exposure and image quality evaluation with the use of iDose4 iterative reconstruction algorithm in chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations.
    Ploussi A; Alexopoulou E; Economopoulos N; Argentos SI; Tsitsia V; Arapakis I; Kordolaimi S; Seimenis I; Efstathopoulos EP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 24107575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee Task Group 223.
    Sechopoulos I; Sabol JM; Berglund J; Bolch WE; Brateman L; Christodoulou E; Flynn M; Geiser W; Goodsitt M; Jones AK; Lo JY; Maidment AD; Nishino K; Nosratieh A; Ren B; Segars WP; Von Tiedemann M
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091501. PubMed ID: 25186375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The author responds.
    Sandridge TG
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(3):347-8. PubMed ID: 24395906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple theorem relating noise and patient dose in computed tomography.
    Harpen MD
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2231-4. PubMed ID: 10587203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A more accurate reconstruction system matrix for quantitative proton computed tomography.
    Penfold SN; Rosenfeld AB; Schulte RW; Schubert KE
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4511-8. PubMed ID: 19928082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography.
    Nykänen K; Siltanen S
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1864-73. PubMed ID: 12906205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.