These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24922998)

  • 1. Dimensional stability ofautoclave sterilised addition cured impressions and trays.
    Deb S; Etemad-Shahidi S; Millar BJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Mar; 22(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 24922998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of sterilized rubber impressions.
    Abdelaziz KM; Hassan AM; Hodges JS
    Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 15798825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of disinfecting alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials on the physical properties of impressions and resultant casts.
    al-Omari WM; Jones JC; Wood DJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Sep; 6(3):103-10. PubMed ID: 10218014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface roughness of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials following chemical disinfection, autoclave and microwave sterilization.
    Al Kheraif AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 24171994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disinfection of impressions. Methods and effects on accuracy.
    Poulos JG; Antonoff LR
    N Y State Dent J; 1997; 63(6):34-6. PubMed ID: 9256603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Influence of autoclave sterilization on dimensional stability and detail reproduction of 5 additional silicone impression materials].
    Xu TK; Sun ZH; Jiang Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 22800674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dimensional stability of self-disinfecting alginate impressions compared to various immersion regimes.
    Jones ML; Newcombe RG; Bellis H; Bottomley J
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 2111646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of a range of disinfectants on the dimensional accuracy and stability of some impression materials.
    Jagger DC; Vowles RW; McNally L; Davis F; O'Sullivan DJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Mar; 15(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17378455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A; Soderholm KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
    Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of disinfectant agents on dimensional stability and surface roughness of a tissue conditioner material.
    Khaledi A; Borhanihaghighi Z; Vojdani M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 22124041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study.
    Reddy JM; Prashanti E; Kumar GV; Suresh Sajjan MC; Mathew X
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20139562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensional change of impressions on sterilization.
    Chia WK; Stevens L; Basford KE; Randell DM
    Aust Dent J; 1990 Feb; 35(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 2108657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.