416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24924117)
1. Comparison of early hearing outcomes of type 2 ossiculoplasty using hydroxyapatite bone cement versus other materials.
Galy-Bernadoy C; Akkari M; Mathiolon C; Mondain M; Uziel A; Venail F
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2014 Nov; 131(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 24924117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies.
Neudert M; Zahnert T; Lasurashvili N; Bornitz M; Lavcheva Z; Offergeld C
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 19174710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kurz titanium prosthesis ossiculoplasty--follow-up statistical analysis of factors affecting one year hearing results.
Alaani A; Raut VV
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Apr; 37(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 19553041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Results after rebuilding the ossicular chain using the autogenous incus, ionomer-cement-and titanium implants (tympanoplasty type III)].
Geyer G; Rocker J
Laryngorhinootologie; 2002 Mar; 81(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 11967767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effect of ossicular chain reconstruction with titanium ossicular replacement prosthesis in mastoidectomy with synchronous ossiculoplasty].
Mao M; Zhai J; Chen G; Zhang J; Ma Z; Xue J
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 28(10):708-11. PubMed ID: 25129971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Efficacy of ossicular chain reconstruction using titanium implants in single-stage tympanoplasty].
CHEN B; TAO DD
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 47(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 22800341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Ossiculoplasty with hydroxyapatite bone cement].
Gérard JM; Cailliau A; Franceschi D; Gersdorff M
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2012; 133(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 23393739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty.
Truy E; Naiman AN; Pavillon C; Abedipour D; Lina-Granade G; Rabilloud M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun; 28(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 17529851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ossicular reconstruction for incus long-process defects: bone cement or partial ossicular replacement prosthesis.
Baylancicek S; Iseri M; Topdağ DÖ; Ustundag E; Ozturk M; Polat S; Uneri C
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Sep; 151(3):468-72. PubMed ID: 24825875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes following ossicular chain reconstruction with composite prostheses: hydroxyapatite-polyethylene vs. hydroxyapatite-titanium.
Hahn Y; Bojrab DI
Ear Nose Throat J; 2013 Jun; 92(6):250, 252, 254 passim. PubMed ID: 23780591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Titanium ossicular chain replacement prostheses: prognostic factors and preliminary functional results.
Mardassi A; Deveze A; Sanjuan M; Mancini J; Parikh B; Elbedeiwy A; Magnan J; Lavieille JP
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2011 Apr; 128(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 21236748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ossicular reconstruction: hydroxyapatite bone cement versus incus remodelling: how to manage incudostapedial discontinuity.
Somers T; Van Rompaey V; Claes G; Salembier L; van Dinther J; Andrzej Z; Offeciers E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 269(4):1095-101. PubMed ID: 21935632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audiometric Outcome Comparison between Titanium Prosthesis and Molded Autologous Material.
Órfão T; Júlio S; Ramos JF; Dias CC; Silveira H; Santos M
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Aug; 151(2):315-20. PubMed ID: 24781657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic ossiculoplasty: Is there any edge over the microscopic technique?
Das A; Mitra S; Ghosh D; Sengupta A
Laryngoscope; 2020 Mar; 130(3):797-802. PubMed ID: 32073145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physiologic reestablishment of ossicular continuity during excision of retraction pockets: use of hydroxyapatite bone cement for rebridging the incus.
Elsheikh MN; Elsherief H; Elsherief S
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Feb; 132(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 16490879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of various bone cement ossiculoplasty techniques and functional results.
Gungor V; Atay G; Bajin MD; Yarali M; Sarac S; Sennaroglu L
Acta Otolaryngol; 2016 Sep; 136(9):883-7. PubMed ID: 27118255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ossiculoplasty with hydroxyapatite bone cement: our reconstruction philosophy.
Gérard JM; De Bie G; Franceschi D; Deggouj N; Gersdorff M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 272(7):1629-35. PubMed ID: 24615652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrocoagulation improving bone cement use in middle-ear surgery: short-term and middle-term results.
Galy-Bernadoy C; Akkari M; Mondain M; Uziel A; Venail F
J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Dec; 130(12):1110-1114. PubMed ID: 27809939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revision stapes surgery for lysis of the long process of the incus: comparing hydroxyapatite bone cement versus malleovestibulopexy and total ossicular replacement prosthesis.
Pitiot V; Hermann R; Tringali S; Dubreuil C; Truy E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Sep; 273(9):2515-21. PubMed ID: 26690574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Malleus to Stapes Bone Cement Rebridging Ossiculoplasty: Why Don't We Perform Frequently?
Edizer DT; Durna YM; Hamit B; Demirhan H; Yigit O
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Jun; 125(6):445-51. PubMed ID: 26631763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
