BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24924271)

  • 1. The effectiveness of an autorefractor with eye-tracking capability in pediatric patients.
    Kirschen D; Isenberg SJ
    J AAPOS; 2014 Jun; 18(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 24924271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of different autorefractors with retinoscopy in children.
    Oral Y; Gunaydin N; Ozgur O; Arsan AK; Oskan S
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2012; 49(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 22938517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeatability of ARK-30 in a pediatric population.
    Hernandez-Moreno L; Vallelado-Alvarez A; Martin R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 66(9):1262-1267. PubMed ID: 30127136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of the Retinomax K-plus3 in measuring refractive error in a pediatric population.
    Peng MY; Matta N; Silbert D; Tian J; Singman E
    J AAPOS; 2014 Aug; 18(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 25173893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overestimation of hyperopia with autorefraction compared with retinoscopy under cycloplegia in school-age children.
    Hashemi H; Khabazkhoob M; Asharlous A; Yekta A; Emamian MH; Fotouhi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 102(12):1717-1722. PubMed ID: 29439996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is the Sphere Value Measured by an Autorefractor Reliable in Children under Cycloplegia? Comparison with Streak Retinoscopy.
    Da Gama RD; Nom TY; Da Costa DC; Dos Santos JC; Da Costa RS; Relha C
    Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano; 2013; 28(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 24372417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Accuracy of two autorefractors--Pediatric Autorefractor plusoptiX and Retinomax--in cycloplegic children in comparison to retinoscopy].
    Schmidt-Bacher AE; Kahlert C; Kolling G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2010 Oct; 227(10):792-7. PubMed ID: 20963682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of refractive error measures by the IRX3 aberrometer and autorefraction.
    McCullough SJ; Little JA; Breslin KM; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1183-90. PubMed ID: 25192432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Examination of preschool children for refractive errors. First experience using a handheld autorefractor].
    Büchner TF; Schnorbus U; Grenzebach UH; Stupp T; Busse H
    Ophthalmologe; 2003 Nov; 100(11):971-8. PubMed ID: 14669034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Plusoptix S12R photoscreener with cycloplegic retinoscopy and autorefraction in pediatric age group.
    Saini V; Raina UK; Gupta A; Goyal JL; Anjum R; Saini P; Gupta SK; Sharma P
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 67(10):1555-1559. PubMed ID: 31546479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the HARK autorefractor in children.
    Isenberg SJ; Del Signore M; Madani-Becker G
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Apr; 131(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 11292405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Spot Vision Screener and Tabletop Autorefractometer with Retinoscopy in the Pediatric Population.
    Arslantürk Eren M; Nalcı Baytaroğlu H; Atilla H
    Turk J Ophthalmol; 2024 Apr; 54(2):56-62. PubMed ID: 38644780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of cycloplegia on the measurement of refractive error in Chinese children.
    Li T; Zhou X; Zhu J; Tang X; Gu X
    Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 30136309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of objective refraction in darkness to cycloplegic refraction: a pilot study.
    Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ; Meehan K; Grk D; Cox M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 26888570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of open-field autorefraction, closed-field autorefraction, and retinoscopy for refractive measurements of children and adolescents in Taiwan.
    Kuo YC; Wang JH; Chiu CJ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Aug; 119(8):1251-1258. PubMed ID: 32354691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of cycloplegia in objective refraction.
    Jorge J; Queiros A; González-Méijome J; Fernandes P; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 15953119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agreement and Repeatability of Noncycloplegic and Cycloplegic Wavefront-based Autorefraction in Children.
    Rauscher FG; Lange H; Yahiaoui-Doktor M; Tegetmeyer H; Sterker I; Hinz A; Wahl S; Wiedemann P; Ohlendorf A; Blendowske R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Nov; 96(11):879-889. PubMed ID: 31703049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Accuracy of three common optometry methods in examination of refraction in juveniles].
    Su T; Min X; Liu S; Li F; Tan X; Zhong Y; Deng S
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 41(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 26932216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.