BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24924558)

  • 1. Lost in translation, or overestimating administrative data for outcome control in colorectal surgery.
    Mroczkowski P
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Jul; 16(7):493-4. PubMed ID: 24924558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response to Mroczkowski (2014): Lost in translation, or overestimating administrative data for outcome control in colorectal surgery.
    Faiz O; Chang D; Livingston E; Pennickx F
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):642-4. PubMed ID: 24787024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconciliation of international administrative coding systems for comparison of colorectal surgery outcome.
    Munasinghe A; Chang D; Mamidanna R; Middleton S; Joy M; Penninckx F; Darzi A; Livingston E; Faiz O;
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Jul; 16(7):555-61. PubMed ID: 24661398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospital procedure volume and outcomes.
    Joshi AV; Miller LA
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Jun; 140(12):1061-2; author reply 1062. PubMed ID: 15197031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volume-outcome analysis in rectal cancer: a plea for enquiry, evidence and evolution.
    Hogan AM; Kennelly R; Winter DC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Feb; 35(2):111-2. PubMed ID: 18656323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 1999. Annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.
    Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery
    Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 49(8):528-41. PubMed ID: 11552283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Colorectal surgery training and patient safety: dissonance in an era of quality reporting.
    Monson JR; Fleming FJ; Iannuzzi JC
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jul; 15(7):785-7. PubMed ID: 23692183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical methods of risk-adjusted statistical process control charts to assess surgical performance in consecutive colorectal operations at a single institution.
    Boudreaux-Kelly M; Wilson M; Bokhari M
    JAMA Surg; 2015 Mar; 150(3):271-2. PubMed ID: 25606809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgery for colorectal cancer in a low-volume unit: assessment of key issues in the achievement of acceptable clinical results.
    Paimela H; Lindström O; Tomminen T; Iivonen M; Könönen E; Kuusanmäki P
    Int J Gastrointest Cancer; 2005; 35(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 16110122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resource variation in colorectal surgery: a national centre level analysis.
    Drake TM; Lee MJ; Senapati A; Brown SR
    Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jul; 19(7):641-648. PubMed ID: 28052574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re: How often do patients return to the operating room after colorectal surgery?
    Burns EM; Faiz OD
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 May; 14(5):642. PubMed ID: 22212115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome-based referral to improve quality of care in upper GI surgery.
    Wouters M
    J Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 98(5):307-8. PubMed ID: 18548474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Key factors associated with postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
    Manilich E; Vogel JD; Kiran RP; Church JM; Seyidova-Khoshknabi D; Remzi FH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jan; 56(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 23222282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data collection systems for weight loss surgery: an evidence-based assessment.
    Hutter MM; Crane M; Keenan M; Snow RL; Schneider BE; Cella RJ
    Obes Res; 2005 Feb; 13(2):301-5. PubMed ID: 15800287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of the Implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS
    AlBalawi Z; Gramlich L; Nelson G; Senior P; Youngson E; McAlister FA
    World J Surg; 2018 Sep; 42(9):2691-2700. PubMed ID: 29532139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How often do patients return to the operating room after colorectal resections?
    Ricciardi R; Roberts PL; Read TE; Marcello PW; Hall JF; Schoetz DJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):515-21. PubMed ID: 21973276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The surgeon as a prognostic factor in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer.
    Di Cataldo A; Scilletta B; Latino R; Cocuzza A; Li Destri G
    Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 16 Suppl 1():S53-6. PubMed ID: 18023175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association between the participation of board-certified surgeons in gastroenterological surgery and operative mortality after eight gastroenterological procedures.
    Konno H; Kamiya K; Kikuchi H; Miyata H; Hirahara N; Gotoh M; Wakabayashi G; Ohta T; Kokudo N; Mori M; Seto Y
    Surg Today; 2017 May; 47(5):611-618. PubMed ID: 27688030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unplanned reoperation within 30 days of surgery for colorectal cancer in NHS Lanarkshire.
    McSorley S; Lowndes C; Sharma P; Macdonald A
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 15(6):689-94. PubMed ID: 23398663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases.
    Altieri MS; Yang J; Telem DA; Zhu J; Halbert C; Talamini M; Pryor AD
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):925-33. PubMed ID: 26139489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.