321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24924734)
1. Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation: the role of coil geometry and tissue depth.
Hardwick RM; Lesage E; Miall RC
Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(5):643-9. PubMed ID: 24924734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Stimulation Intensity and Coil Type on Reliability and Tolerability of Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) via Dual-Coil TMS.
Fernandez L; Major BP; Teo WP; Byrne LK; Enticott PG
Cerebellum; 2018 Oct; 17(5):540-549. PubMed ID: 29730789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stimulating deep cortical structures with the batwing coil: how to determine the intensity for transcranial magnetic stimulation using coil-cortex distance.
Cai W; George JS; Chambers CD; Stokes MG; Verbruggen F; Aron AR
J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 204(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 22138632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation: The role of coil type from distinct manufacturers.
Spampinato D; Ibáñez J; Spanoudakis M; Hammond P; Rothwell JC
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(1):153-156. PubMed ID: 31631057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utilising TMS-EEG to Assess the Response to Cerebellar-Brain Inhibition.
Sasaki R; Hand BJ; Liao WY; Rogasch NC; Fernandez L; Semmler JG; Opie GM
Cerebellum; 2023 Aug; 22(4):544-558. PubMed ID: 35661100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-lasting inhibition of cerebellar output.
Popa T; Russo M; Meunier S
Brain Stimul; 2010 Jul; 3(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 20633445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cerebellar-Motor Cortex Connectivity: One or Two Different Networks?
Spampinato DA; Celnik PA; Rothwell JC
J Neurosci; 2020 May; 40(21):4230-4239. PubMed ID: 32312885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EEG responses induced by cerebellar TMS at rest and during visuomotor adaptation.
Fong PY; Spampinato D; Michell K; Mancuso M; Brown K; Ibáñez J; Santo AD; Latorre A; Bhatia K; Rothwell JC; Rocchi L
Neuroimage; 2023 Jul; 275():120188. PubMed ID: 37230209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): A systematic review.
Fernandez L; Major BP; Teo WP; Byrne LK; Enticott PG
Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2018 Mar; 86():176-206. PubMed ID: 29208533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neck muscle fatigue impacts plasticity and sensorimotor integration in cerebellum and motor cortex in response to novel motor skill acquisition.
Zabihhosseinian M; Yielder P; Berkers V; Ambalavanar U; Holmes M; Murphy B
J Neurophysiol; 2020 Sep; 124(3):844-855. PubMed ID: 32755363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing cerebellar-cortical connectivity using concurrent TMS-EEG: a feasibility study.
Fernandez L; Biabani M; Do M; Opie GM; Hill AT; Barham MP; Teo WP; Byrne LK; Rogasch NC; Enticott PG
J Neurophysiol; 2021 May; 125(5):1768-1787. PubMed ID: 33788622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of coil type and limb dominance in the assessment of lower-limb motor cortex excitability using TMS.
Dharmadasa T; Matamala JM; Howells J; Simon NG; Vucic S; Kiernan MC
Neurosci Lett; 2019 Apr; 699():84-90. PubMed ID: 30710665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Stokes MG; Chambers CD; Gould IC; English T; McNaught E; McDonald O; Mattingley JB
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jul; 118(7):1617-25. PubMed ID: 17524764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motor cortex activation by H-coil and figure-8 coil at different depths. Combined motor threshold and electric field distribution study.
Roth Y; Pell GS; Chistyakov AV; Sinai A; Zangen A; Zaaroor M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Feb; 125(2):336-43. PubMed ID: 23994191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. H-coil: Induced electric field properties and input/output curves on healthy volunteers, comparison with a standard figure-of-eight coil.
Fadini T; Matthäus L; Rothkegel H; Sommer M; Tergau F; Schweikard A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jun; 120(6):1174-82. PubMed ID: 19433366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduced Cerebellar Brain Inhibition Measured Using Dual-Site TMS in Older Than in Younger Adults.
Rurak BK; Rodrigues JP; Power BD; Drummond PD; Vallence AM
Cerebellum; 2022 Feb; 21(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 33880658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Somatosensory inputs modulate the excitability of cerebellar-cortical interaction.
Bonassi G; Pelosin E; Lagravinese G; Bisio A; Grasselli G; Bove M; Avanzino L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2021 Dec; 132(12):3095-3103. PubMed ID: 34740041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative Evaluation of Cerebellar Function in Multiple System Atrophy with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Shirota Y; Hanajima R; Shimizu T; Terao Y; Tsuji S; Ugawa Y
Cerebellum; 2022 Apr; 21(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 34128209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atlas of optimal coil orientation and position for TMS: A computational study.
Gomez-Tames J; Hamasaka A; Laakso I; Hirata A; Ugawa Y
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(4):839-848. PubMed ID: 29699821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cerebellar transcranial static magnetic field stimulation transiently reduces cerebellar brain inhibition.
Matsugi A; Okada Y
Funct Neurol; 2017; 32(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 28676140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
