461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24925047)
41. Academic tweeting in #ObGyn. Where do we stand?
Yadav GS; Nagarkatti NR; Rohondia SO; Erfani H; Kilpatrick CC; Turrentine MA
J Perinat Med; 2019 Oct; 47(8):867-870. PubMed ID: 31494634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor.
Shaath MK; Kerr MS; Schwartzman JD; Avilucea FR; Munro MW; Langford JR; Haidukewych GJ
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev; 2023 Jul; 7(7):. PubMed ID: 37493626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. #VascularSurgery.
Hage AN; Srinivasa RN; Bundy JJ; Gemmete JJ; Johnson EJ; Srinivasa RN; Patel N; Khayat M; Coleman D; Abramowitz SD; Chick JFB
Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Nov; 53():217-223. PubMed ID: 30048687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Imbalance of opinions expressed on Twitter relating to CT radiation risk: an opportunity for increased radiologist representation.
Prabhu V; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):W48-51. PubMed ID: 25539274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Epilepsy in the Twitter era: a need to re-tweet the way we think about seizures.
McNeil K; Brna PM; Gordon KE
Epilepsy Behav; 2012 Feb; 23(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 22134096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. #Ophthalmology: Social Media Utilization and Impact in Ophthalmology Journals, Professional Societies, and Eye Health Organizations.
Cohen SA; Pershing S
Clin Ophthalmol; 2022; 16():2989-3001. PubMed ID: 36092462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Online Journal Club: Experience from the International Urology Journal Club.
Thangasamy IA; Loeb S; Sathianathen NJ; Leveridge M; Stork B; Davies BJ; Woo HH
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):482-488. PubMed ID: 31679867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Alternative Metrics ("Altmetrics") for Assessing Article Impact in Popular General Radiology Journals.
Rosenkrantz AB; Ayoola A; Singh K; Duszak R
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):891-897. PubMed ID: 28256440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Twitter expands the reach and engagement of a national scientific meeting: the Irish Society of Urology.
Nason GJ; O'Kelly F; Bouchier-Hayes D; Quinlan DM; Manecksha RP
Ir J Med Sci; 2015 Sep; 184(3):685-9. PubMed ID: 25740094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact.
Eysenbach G
J Med Internet Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):e123. PubMed ID: 22173204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Manuscript characteristics associated with the altmetrics score and social media presence: an analysis of seven spine journals.
Richardson MA; Bernstein DN; Mesfin A
Spine J; 2021 Apr; 21(4):548-554. PubMed ID: 33189908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Modern Impact of Surgery Journals: Associations Between Impact Factor, H5-Index, and Altmetric Score.
Martins RS; Wasif N
J Surg Res; 2023 Aug; 288():282-289. PubMed ID: 37043875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Twitter promotion is associated with higher citation rates of cardiovascular articles: the ESC Journals Randomized Study.
Ladeiras-Lopes R; Vidal-Perez R; Santos-Ferreira D; Alexander M; Baciu L; Clarke S; Crea F; Lüscher TF
Eur Heart J; 2022 May; 43(19):1794-1798. PubMed ID: 35567549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature.
Erskine N; Hendricks S
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jul; 23(7):e26378. PubMed ID: 34319238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluating Patient Perspectives of Provider Professionalism on Twitter in an Academic Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic: Patient Survey.
Maben-Feaster RE; Stansfield RB; Opipari A; Hammoud MM
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e78. PubMed ID: 29530838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Twitter use at a family medicine conference: analyzing #STFM13.
Mishori R; Levy B; Donvan B
Fam Med; 2014 Sep; 46(8):608-14. PubMed ID: 25163039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. How we use social media to supplement a novel curriculum in medical education.
Bahner DP; Adkins E; Patel N; Donley C; Nagel R; Kman NE
Med Teach; 2012; 34(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 22449268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Social media impact factor: the top ten dermatology journals on Facebook and Twitter.
Karimkhani C; Gamble R; Dellavalle RP
Dermatol Online J; 2014 Apr; 20(4):22327. PubMed ID: 24746295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Impact of Spanish-language urological publications in periodicals in the English language].
Pérez Arbej JA; Cameo Rico MI; Arnáiz Esteban F; Martínez Pérez E; Nogueras Gimeno MA; Espuela Orgaz R; Crespo Mayor V
Arch Esp Urol; 1997 Jun; 50(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 9382584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The impact of social media on citation rates in coloproctology.
Jeong JW; Kim MJ; Oh HK; Jeong S; Kim MH; Cho JR; Kim DW; Kang SB
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Oct; 21(10):1175-1182. PubMed ID: 31124259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
