301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24925524)
1. Is clinical breast examination effective in Japan? Consideration from the age-specific performance of breast cancer screening combining mammography with clinical breast examination.
Ohta K; Kasahara Y; Tanaka F; Maeda H
Breast Cancer; 2016 Mar; 23(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 24925524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program.
Oestreicher N; Lehman CD; Seger DJ; Buist DS; White E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):428-32. PubMed ID: 15671358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.
Warner E; Plewes DB; Hill KA; Causer PA; Zubovits JT; Jong RA; Cutrara MR; DeBoer G; Yaffe MJ; Messner SJ; Meschino WS; Piron CA; Narod SA
JAMA; 2004 Sep; 292(11):1317-25. PubMed ID: 15367553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of the benefit and harms of including clinical breast examination in an organized breast screening program.
Jiang H; Walter SD; Brown P; Raina P; Chiarelli AM
Breast; 2019 Feb; 43():105-112. PubMed ID: 30544057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Promotion of quality-controlled mammography alone as a screening modality in Japan.
Morimoto T; Tangoku A; Yamakawa T; Tsuruno M; Takashima S
Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 23515946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age-specific interval breast cancers in Japan: estimation of the proper sensitivity of screening using a population-based cancer registry.
Suzuki A; Kuriyama S; Kawai M; Amari M; Takeda M; Ishida T; Ohnuki K; Nishino Y; Tsuji I; Shibuya D; Ohuchi N
Cancer Sci; 2008 Nov; 99(11):2264-7. PubMed ID: 18795941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening clinical breast examination: how often does it miss lethal breast cancer?
Fenton JJ; Barton MB; Geiger AM; Herrinton LJ; Rolnick SJ; Harris EL; Barlow WE; Reisch LM; Fletcher SW; Elmore JG
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):67-71. PubMed ID: 16287888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography without clinical breast examination among Japanese women aged 40-49 years: analysis of data from the J-START results.
Uematsu T
Breast Cancer; 2022 Sep; 29(5):928-931. PubMed ID: 35507294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammography benefit in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: a model evaluation.
Rijnsburger AJ; van Oortmarssen GJ; Boer R; Draisma G; To T; Miller AB; de Koning HJ
Int J Cancer; 2004 Jul; 110(5):756-62. PubMed ID: 15146566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short report: Limited effectiveness of screening mammography in addition to clinical breast examination by trained nurse midwives in rural Jakarta, Indonesia.
Kardinah D; Anderson BO; Duggan C; Ali IA; Thomas DB
Int J Cancer; 2014 Mar; 134(5):1250-5. PubMed ID: 24037942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening clinical breast examination.
Jatoi I
Surg Clin North Am; 2003 Aug; 83(4):789-801. PubMed ID: 12875596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammography screening in the early detection of breast cancer.
Bancej C; Decker K; Chiarelli A; Harrison M; Turner D; Brisson J
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 12790311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
Shen Y; Parmigiani G
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 15734983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and self breast examination remain important in the era of modern screening.
Ma I; Dueck A; Gray R; Wasif N; Giurescu M; Lorans R; Pizzitola V; Pockaj B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 22160521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical breast examination: preliminary results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in India.
Sankaranarayanan R; Ramadas K; Thara S; Muwonge R; Prabhakar J; Augustine P; Venugopal M; Anju G; Mathew BS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Oct; 103(19):1476-80. PubMed ID: 21862730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical breast examination for screening of asymptomatic women: the importance of clinical breast examination for breast cancer detection.
Park BW; Kim SI; Kim MH; Kim EK; Park SH; Lee KS
Yonsei Med J; 2000 Jun; 41(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 10957884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance Measures of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Plus Mammography in the High Risk Ontario Breast Screening Program.
Chiarelli AM; Blackmore KM; Muradali D; Done SJ; Majpruz V; Weerasinghe A; Mirea L; Eisen A; Rabeneck L; Warner E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2020 Feb; 112(2):136-144. PubMed ID: 31233143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
