These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Contrast and reallocation of extraneous reinforcers as a function of component duration and baseline rate of reinforcement. McLean AP J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Mar; 63(2):203-24. PubMed ID: 16812757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change. Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Within-session changes in responding during concurrent schedules with different reinforcers in the components. McSweeney FK; Swindell S; Weatherly JN J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Nov; 66(3):369-90. PubMed ID: 8921615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Matching, contrast, and equalizing in the concurrent lever-press responding of rats. Norman WD; McSweeney FK J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 May; 29(3):453-62. PubMed ID: 16812069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Behavioral contrast using different reinforcers: effect of baseline rate of reinforcement. Weatherly JN; Melville CL; Swindell S Behav Processes; 1998 Jul; 44(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24896723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of place of reinforcer delivery in the appearance of positive induction when rats respond for 1% sucrose. Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Kristiansen-Moen LA Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 16782285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simple and multiple schedule responding and behavioral contrast when pigeons press treadles. McSweeney FK; Dougan JD; Farmer VA Behav Processes; 1986 Mar; 12(3):273-85. PubMed ID: 24897589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Some effects of desmethylimipramine and amitriptyline on the schedule-controlled behavior of pigeons and rats. Lamb RJ; McMillan DE Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther; 1989; 302():49-67. PubMed ID: 2636825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response persistence under variable-time schedules following immediate and unsignalled delayed reinforcement. Doughty AH; Lattal KA Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Aug; 56(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 12881162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies. Spealman RD; Katz JL; Witkin JM J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Sep; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 702026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Independent ethanol- and sucrose-maintained responding on a multiple schedule of reinforcement. Czachowski CL; Samson HH; Denning CE Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1999 Mar; 23(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 10195809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Successive independence and behavioral contrast in a closed economy. White KG; Alsop B; McLean AP J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 1402604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Within-session rates of responding when reinforcer magnitude is changed within the session. Weatherly JN; McSweeney FK; Swindell S J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 14977028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]