301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24925838)
1. Comparison of analytical and numerical analysis of the reference region model for DCE-MRI.
Lee J; Cárdenas-Rodríguez J; Pagel MD; Platt S; Kent M; Zhao Q
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):845-53. PubMed ID: 24925838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameter ratios in DCE-MRI using the reference region model.
Lee J; Platt S; Kent M; Zhao Q
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jan; 30(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 22071409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Murase K
Magn Reson Med; 2004 Apr; 51(4):858-62. PubMed ID: 15065262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. GPU-accelerated nonparametric kinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data from glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab.
Hsu YH; Ferl GZ; Ng CM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 May; 31(4):618-23. PubMed ID: 23200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sampling requirements in DCE-MRI based analysis of high grade gliomas: simulations and clinical results.
Larsson C; Kleppestø M; Rasmussen I; Salo R; Vardal J; Brandal P; Bjørnerud A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Apr; 37(4):818-29. PubMed ID: 23086710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fitting the two-compartment model in DCE-MRI by linear inversion.
Flouri D; Lesnic D; Sourbron SP
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Sep; 76(3):998-1006. PubMed ID: 26376011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. T2*-correction in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI from double-echo acquisitions.
Kleppestø M; Larsson C; Groote I; Salo R; Vardal J; Courivaud F; Bjørnerud A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 24123598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tumors: preclinical validation of parametric images.
Egeland TA; Simonsen TG; Gaustad JV; Gulliksrud K; Ellingsen C; Rofstad EK
Radiat Res; 2009 Sep; 172(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 19708783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uncertainty estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Garpebring A; Brynolfsson P; Yu J; Wirestam R; Johansson A; Asklund T; Karlsson M
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Apr; 69(4):992-1002. PubMed ID: 22714717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with maxillofacial tumors.
Kitamoto E; Chikui T; Kawano S; Ohga M; Kobayashi K; Matsuo Y; Yoshiura T; Obara M; Honda H; Yoshiura K
Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 25442795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimized Fast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: Effect of Sampling Duration on Pharmacokinetic Parameters.
Othman AE; Falkner F; Martirosian P; Schraml C; Schwentner C; Nickel D; Nikolaou K; Notohamiprodjo M
Invest Radiol; 2016 Feb; 51(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 26447494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing MRI scan time in the computation of pharmacokinetic parameters (K(trans) ) in breast cancer diagnosis.
Jena A; Mehta SB; Taneja S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):573-9. PubMed ID: 23349046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Cheng HL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):736-43. PubMed ID: 18777534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability of a reference region model for analysis of murine DCE-MRI data at 7T.
Yankeelov TE; DeBusk LM; Billheimer DD; Luci JJ; Lin PC; Price RR; Gore JC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1140-7. PubMed ID: 17024660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pharmacokinetic modeling of delayed gadolinium enhancement in the myocardium.
Knowles BR; Batchelor PG; Parish V; Ginks M; Plein S; Razavi R; Schaeffter T
Magn Reson Med; 2008 Dec; 60(6):1524-30. PubMed ID: 19025896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An adaptive model for rapid and direct estimation of extravascular extracellular space in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI studies.
Dehkordi AN; Kamali-Asl A; Ewing JR; Wen N; Chetty IJ; Bagher-Ebadian H
NMR Biomed; 2017 May; 30(5):. PubMed ID: 28195664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for assessment of bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease pilot study.
Oto A; Fan X; Mustafi D; Jansen SA; Karczmar GS; Rubin DT; Kayhan A
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1223-30. PubMed ID: 19524458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation.
Yang C; Karczmar GS; Medved M; Stadler WM
Magn Reson Med; 2007 Dec; 58(6):1266-75. PubMed ID: 17969061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
