BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24927245)

  • 1. Comparing robotic surgery with conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer management.
    Chen CH; Chiu LH; Chang CW; Yen YK; Huang YH; Liu WM
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Jul; 24(6):1105-11. PubMed ID: 24927245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
    Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: an analysis of the risk factors of surgical complications and of oncologic outcomes.
    Garabedian C; Merlot B; Bresson L; Tresch E; Narducci F; Leblanc E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 25647258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
    Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Saltari M; Mancini E; Sindico S; Vici P; Sergi D; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Pomati G; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 26825826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy after preoperative brachytherapy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: feasibility, results, and surgical implications in a large bicentric study of 162 consecutive cases.
    Uzan C; Merlot B; Gouy S; Belghiti J; Haie-Meder C; Nickers P; Fabrice N; Morice P; Leblanc E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):872-80. PubMed ID: 22932859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oncological outcome and long-term complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study.
    Hoogendam JP; Verheijen RH; Wegner I; Zweemer RP
    BJOG; 2014 Nov; 121(12):1538-45. PubMed ID: 24735243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
    Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
    Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes with Laparotomy, and Laparoscopic or Robotic Surgery for Women with Endometrial Cancer.
    Manchana T; Puangsricharoen P; Sirisabya N; Worasethsin P; Vasuratna A; Termrungruanglert W; Tresukosol D
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(13):5483-8. PubMed ID: 26225698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.
    Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
    Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26409687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A case-control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.
    Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim S; Kim JH; Jung YW; Paek JH; Lee SH; Kim JW; Kim YT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1284-9. PubMed ID: 21289494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with open radical hysterectomy.
    Geisler JP; Orr CJ; Khurshid N; Phibbs G; Manahan KJ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Apr; 20(3):438-42. PubMed ID: 20375811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
    Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park DA; Yun JE; Kim SW; Lee SH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 27546015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early cervical cancer managed by laparoscopy and conventional surgery: comparison of treatment results.
    Sobiczewski P; Bidzinski M; Derlatka P; Panek G; Danska-Bidzinska A; Gmyrek L; Michalski W
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Nov; 19(8):1390-5. PubMed ID: 20009895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer management: a cohort study.
    Chiou HY; Chiu LH; Chen CH; Yen YK; Chang CW; Liu WM
    Int J Surg; 2015 Jan; 13():17-22. PubMed ID: 25463760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.