These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

597 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24928108)

  • 41. Does the Winter or Pell and Gregory Classification System Indicate the Apical Position of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars?
    Khojastepour L; Khaghaninejad MS; Hasanshahi R; Forghani M; Ahrari F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Nov; 77(11):2222.e1-2222.e9. PubMed ID: 31306615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Preoperative assessment of the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal by axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction.
    Maegawa H; Sano K; Kitagawa Y; Ogasawara T; Miyauchi K; Sekine J; Inokuchi T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Nov; 96(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 14600702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of the relationship between appearances of the lingual foramen on panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Isman O; Kayar S; Surmelioglu D; Ciftci ME; Aktan AM
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Feb; 23(2):205-211. PubMed ID: 32031095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Degree of Compression of the Inferior Alveolar Canal on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Outcomes of Postoperative Nerve Injury in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery.
    Sklavos A; Delpachitra S; Jaunay T; Kumar R; Chandu A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 79(5):974-980. PubMed ID: 33529607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Clinical investigation of root retention or removal during impacted mandibular third molar extraction].
    Shen HP
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Dec; 19(6):598-600. PubMed ID: 21431258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.
    Guerrero ME; Botetano R; Beltran J; Horner K; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):335-42. PubMed ID: 23494455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Accuracy of panoramic radiographic predictor signs in the assessment of proximity of impacted third molars with the mandibular canal.
    Elkhateeb SM; Awad SS
    J Taibah Univ Med Sci; 2018 Jun; 13(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 31435332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Study of Inferior Alveolar Canal at the Lower Third Molar Apical Region With Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Tudtiam T; Leelarungsun R; Khoo LK; Chaiyasamut T; Arayasantiparb R; Wongsirichat N
    J Clin Med Res; 2019 May; 11(5):353-359. PubMed ID: 31019630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Radiographic methods used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics.
    Matzen LH; Petersen LB; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150226. PubMed ID: 26943178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of the vertical tube shift method in identifying the relationship between the third molars and the mandibular canal.
    de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Oenning AC; Felizardo MG; Haiter-Neto F; de Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Apr; 19(3):583-8. PubMed ID: 24994577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cortical integrity of the inferior alveolar canal as a predictor of paresthesia after third-molar extraction.
    Park W; Choi JW; Kim JY; Kim BC; Kim HJ; Lee SH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Mar; 141(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 20194382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Efficacy of the technique of piezoelectric corticotomy for orthodontic traction of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Ma Z; Xu G; Yang C; Xie Q; Shen Y; Zhang S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 25638568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Relationship between Impacted Mandibular Third Molars and the Mandibular Canal on CBCT Scans.
    Safi Y; Moshfeghi M; Ahsaie MG; Zameni M; Sahafi SA
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2024; 34(3):65-74. PubMed ID: 38505895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of the relationship between mandibular third molar and mandibular canal by different algorithms of cone-beam computed tomography.
    Mehdizadeh M; Ahmadi N; Jamshidi M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):740-5. PubMed ID: 25825100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Is it possible to predict neurosensory alterations in impacted lower third molar removal based on preoperative imaging procedures? A prospective cohort study.
    Pérez-González F; Sánchez-Labrador L; Cortés-Bretón-Brinkmann J; Sáez-Alcaide LM; Bazal-Bonelli S; Madrigal-Martínez-Pereda C; López-Quiles J
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2024 Jan; 29(1):e44-e50. PubMed ID: 37992147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Association between impacted third molars and position of the mandibular canal: a morphological analysis using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Quirino de Almeida Barros R; Bezerra de Melo N; de Macedo Bernardino Í; Arêa Leão Lopes Araújo Arruda MJ; Meira Bento P
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 56(10):952-955. PubMed ID: 30448357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Anatomical differences in lower third molars visualized by 2D and 3D X-ray imaging: clinical outcomes after extraction.
    Jun SH; Kim CH; Ahn JS; Padwa BL; Kwon JJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 42(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 23352698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Correlation of mandibular impacted tooth and bone morphology determined by cone beam computed topography on a premise of third molar operation.
    Momin MA; Matsumoto K; Ejima K; Asaumi R; Kawai T; Arai Y; Honda K; Yosue T
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2013 May; 35(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 23143074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Contiguity between the mandibular canal and the mandibular third molar in panoramic tomography compared with cone beam computed tomography: a topographic analysis.
    Deppe H; Ritschl LM; Kleinschmidt J; Wagenpfeil S; Sculean A
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(6):470-477. PubMed ID: 31086860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.