BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24929483)

  • 1. A novel balloon colonoscope detects significantly more simulated polyps than a standard colonoscope in a colon model.
    Hasan N; Gross SA; Gralnek IM; Pochapin M; Kiesslich R; Halpern Z
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1135-40. PubMed ID: 24929483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of standard forward-viewing mode versus ultrawide-viewing mode of a novel colonoscopy platform: a prospective, multicenter study in the detection of simulated polyps in an in vitro colon model (with video).
    Gralnek IM; Carr-Locke DL; Segol O; Halpern Z; Siersema PD; Sloyer A; Fenster J; Lewis BS; Santo E; Suissa A; Segev M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):472-9. PubMed ID: 23410700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short turn radius colonoscope in an anatomical model: retroflexed withdrawal and detection of hidden polyps.
    McGill SK; Kothari S; Friedland S; Chen A; Park WG; Banerjee S
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 21(2):593-9. PubMed ID: 25593483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel extra-wide-angle-view colonoscope: a simulated pilot study using anatomic colorectal models.
    Uraoka T; Tanaka S; Matsumoto T; Matsuda T; Oka S; Moriyama T; Higashi R; Saito Y
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):480-3. PubMed ID: 23199903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
    DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos).
    Waye JD; Heigh RI; Fleischer DE; Leighton JA; Gurudu S; Aldrich LB; Li J; Ramrakhiani S; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS; Jonnalagadda S; Bresalier RS; Kessler WR; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):551-6. PubMed ID: 20018280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device (Third Eye Retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon.
    Triadafilopoulos G; Watts HD; Higgins J; Van Dam J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jan; 65(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 17185094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy increases polyp detection rate: a simulated randomized study involving an anatomic colorectal model and 32 international endoscopists.
    Pioche M; Matsumoto M; Takamaru H; Sakamoto T; Nakajima T; Matsuda T; Abe S; Kakugawa Y; Otake Y; Saito Y
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jan; 30(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 25861907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study.
    Halpern Z; Gross SA; Gralnek IM; Shpak B; Pochapin M; Hoffman A; Mizrahi M; Rochberger YS; Moshkowitz M; Santo E; Melhem A; Grinshpon R; Pfefer J; Kiesslich R
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 25704662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.
    Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of in vivo colorectal polyp discrimination by using dual-focus high-definition narrow-band imaging colonoscopy.
    Wallace MB; Crook JE; Coe S; Ussui V; Staggs E; Almansa C; Patel MK; Bouras E; Cangemi J; Keaveny A; Picco M; Riegert-Johnson D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1072-87. PubMed ID: 24973171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).
    Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study.
    Leufkens AM; DeMarco DC; Rastogi A; Akerman PA; Azzouzi K; Rothstein RI; Vleggaar FP; Repici A; Rando G; Okolo PI; Dewit O; Ignjatovic A; Odstrcil E; East J; Deprez PH; Saunders BP; Kalloo AN; Creel B; Singh V; Lennon AM; Siersema PD;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):480-9. PubMed ID: 21067735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advanced technology for the improvement of adenoma and polyp detection during colonoscopy.
    Moriyama T; Uraoka T; Esaki M; Matsumoto T
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Apr; 27 Suppl 1():40-4. PubMed ID: 25556542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
    Rex DK; Chadalawada V; Helper DJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Sep; 98(9):2000-5. PubMed ID: 14499778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-balloon colonoscopy versus repeat standard colonoscopy for previous incomplete colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Keswani RN
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):507-12. PubMed ID: 21145054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.
    Ou G; Kim E; Lakzadeh P; Tong J; Enns R; Ramji A; Whittaker S; Ko HH; Bressler B; Halparin L; Lam E; Amar J; Telford J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 24629419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy.
    Dik VK; Moons LM; Siersema PD
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 20(9):2200-11. PubMed ID: 24605019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
    East JE; Stavrindis M; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Tekkis PP; Saunders BP
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study.
    Leufkens AM; van Oijen MG; Vleggaar FP; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22441756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.