These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24929483)

  • 1. A novel balloon colonoscope detects significantly more simulated polyps than a standard colonoscope in a colon model.
    Hasan N; Gross SA; Gralnek IM; Pochapin M; Kiesslich R; Halpern Z
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1135-40. PubMed ID: 24929483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of standard forward-viewing mode versus ultrawide-viewing mode of a novel colonoscopy platform: a prospective, multicenter study in the detection of simulated polyps in an in vitro colon model (with video).
    Gralnek IM; Carr-Locke DL; Segol O; Halpern Z; Siersema PD; Sloyer A; Fenster J; Lewis BS; Santo E; Suissa A; Segev M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):472-9. PubMed ID: 23410700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short turn radius colonoscope in an anatomical model: retroflexed withdrawal and detection of hidden polyps.
    McGill SK; Kothari S; Friedland S; Chen A; Park WG; Banerjee S
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 21(2):593-9. PubMed ID: 25593483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel extra-wide-angle-view colonoscope: a simulated pilot study using anatomic colorectal models.
    Uraoka T; Tanaka S; Matsumoto T; Matsuda T; Oka S; Moriyama T; Higashi R; Saito Y
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):480-3. PubMed ID: 23199903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
    DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos).
    Waye JD; Heigh RI; Fleischer DE; Leighton JA; Gurudu S; Aldrich LB; Li J; Ramrakhiani S; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS; Jonnalagadda S; Bresalier RS; Kessler WR; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):551-6. PubMed ID: 20018280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device (Third Eye Retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon.
    Triadafilopoulos G; Watts HD; Higgins J; Van Dam J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jan; 65(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 17185094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy increases polyp detection rate: a simulated randomized study involving an anatomic colorectal model and 32 international endoscopists.
    Pioche M; Matsumoto M; Takamaru H; Sakamoto T; Nakajima T; Matsuda T; Abe S; Kakugawa Y; Otake Y; Saito Y
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jan; 30(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 25861907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study.
    Halpern Z; Gross SA; Gralnek IM; Shpak B; Pochapin M; Hoffman A; Mizrahi M; Rochberger YS; Moshkowitz M; Santo E; Melhem A; Grinshpon R; Pfefer J; Kiesslich R
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 25704662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.
    Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of in vivo colorectal polyp discrimination by using dual-focus high-definition narrow-band imaging colonoscopy.
    Wallace MB; Crook JE; Coe S; Ussui V; Staggs E; Almansa C; Patel MK; Bouras E; Cangemi J; Keaveny A; Picco M; Riegert-Johnson D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1072-87. PubMed ID: 24973171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).
    Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study.
    Leufkens AM; DeMarco DC; Rastogi A; Akerman PA; Azzouzi K; Rothstein RI; Vleggaar FP; Repici A; Rando G; Okolo PI; Dewit O; Ignjatovic A; Odstrcil E; East J; Deprez PH; Saunders BP; Kalloo AN; Creel B; Singh V; Lennon AM; Siersema PD;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):480-9. PubMed ID: 21067735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advanced technology for the improvement of adenoma and polyp detection during colonoscopy.
    Moriyama T; Uraoka T; Esaki M; Matsumoto T
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Apr; 27 Suppl 1():40-4. PubMed ID: 25556542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
    Rex DK; Chadalawada V; Helper DJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Sep; 98(9):2000-5. PubMed ID: 14499778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-balloon colonoscopy versus repeat standard colonoscopy for previous incomplete colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Keswani RN
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):507-12. PubMed ID: 21145054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.
    Ou G; Kim E; Lakzadeh P; Tong J; Enns R; Ramji A; Whittaker S; Ko HH; Bressler B; Halparin L; Lam E; Amar J; Telford J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 24629419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy.
    Dik VK; Moons LM; Siersema PD
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 20(9):2200-11. PubMed ID: 24605019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
    East JE; Stavrindis M; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Tekkis PP; Saunders BP
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study.
    Leufkens AM; van Oijen MG; Vleggaar FP; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22441756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.