1253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24929759)
1. Comparison of the staging of regional lymph nodes using the sixth and seventh editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for the evaluation of overall survival in gastric cancer patients: findings of a case-control analysis involving a single institution in China.
Deng J; Zhang R; Pan Y; Wang B; Wu L; Jiao X; Bao T; Hao X; Liang H
Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 24929759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison between the seventh and sixth editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against classification of gastric cancer.
Zhang J; Niu Z; Zhou Y; Cao S
Ann Surg; 2013 Jan; 257(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 23059507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
Alatengbaolide ; Lin D; Li Y; Xu H; Chen J; Wang B; Liu C; Lu P
Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 22547011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical implication of an insufficient number of examined lymph nodes after curative resection for gastric cancer.
Son T; Hyung WJ; Lee JH; Kim YM; Kim HI; An JY; Cheong JH; Noh SH
Cancer; 2012 Oct; 118(19):4687-93. PubMed ID: 22415925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The RML of lymph node metastasis was superior to the LODDS for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer.
Liu H; Deng J; Zhang R; Hao X; Jiao X; Liang H
Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 23541652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suitability of 7th UICC N stage for predicting the overall survival of gastric cancer patients after curative resection in China.
Deng J; Liang H; Sun D; Wang D; Pan Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 May; 17(5):1259-66. PubMed ID: 20217252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tumor volume as a prognostic factor was superior to the seventh edition of the pT classification in resectable gastric cancer.
Jiang N; Deng JY; Ding XW; Liu Y; Liang H
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 41(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 25601610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does a minimum number of 16 retrieved nodes affect survival in curatively resected gastric cancer?
Biondi A; D'Ugo D; Cananzi FC; Papa V; Borasi A; Sicoli F; Degiuli M; Doglietto G; Persiani R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jun; 41(6):779-86. PubMed ID: 25899981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cohort study based on the seventh edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: proposal of a new staging system.
Warneke VS; Behrens HM; Hartmann JT; Held H; Becker T; Schwarz NT; Röcken C
J Clin Oncol; 2011 Jun; 29(17):2364-71. PubMed ID: 21537040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer.
Ichikawa D; Kurioka H; Ueshima Y; Shirono K; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Lee CJ; Hamashima T; Deguchi E; Ikeda E; Mutoh F; Yamagishi H
Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(49):301-4. PubMed ID: 12630046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.
Kikuchi S; Futawatari N; Sakuramoto S; Katada N; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Nemoto M; Watanabe M
Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2361-5. PubMed ID: 21737665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph nodes ratio in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma after curative gastrectomy.
Zhang M; Wang J; Shi W; Chen W; Li W; Shu Y; Liu P; Lu K
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(10):1874-8. PubMed ID: 24824248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.
Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N
Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relevance of hepatoduodenal ligament lymph nodes in resectional surgery for gastric cancer.
Lee SL; Lee HH; Ko YH; Song KY; Park CH; Jeon HM; Kim SS
Br J Surg; 2014 Apr; 101(5):518-22. PubMed ID: 24615472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.
Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Rossi S; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Nigri G; Ercolani G; De Angelis R; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 17439029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of the prognostic value of UICC and JGCA lymph node staging criteria for gastric cancer].
Pan Y; Liang H; Xue Q; Zhang RP; Cui QH; Liu N; Wang BG
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 May; 30(5):376-80. PubMed ID: 18953840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What is the role of nodal ratio as a prognostic factor for gastric cancer nowadays? Comparison with new TNM staging system and analysis according to the number of resected nodes.
Aurello P; Catracchia V; Petrucciani N; D'Angelo F; Leonardo G; Picchetto A; Antolino L; Magistri P; Terrenato I; Lauro A; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2013 May; 79(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 23635583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of the anatomical location and the number of metastatic lymph nodes on gastric cancer patient´s survival.
Duchon R; Bernadic M; Pindak D
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2020; 121(4):253-258. PubMed ID: 32356438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The rationality of N3 classification in the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinomas: a case-control study.
Jun KH; Lee JS; Kim JH; Kim JJ; Chin HM; Park SM
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):893-6. PubMed ID: 25026311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Topographic lymph node staging system shows prognostic superiority compared to the 8th edition of AJCC TNM in gastric cancer. A western monocentric experience.
Lauricella S; Caricato M; Mascianà G; Carannante F; Carnazza M; Bonaccorso A; Angeletti S; Ciccozzi M; Coppola R; Capolupo GT
Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():223-233. PubMed ID: 32869748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
