These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24930172)

  • 1. Visualizing uncertainty: the impact on performance.
    Kirschenbaum SS; Trafton JG; Schunn CD; Trickett SB
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):509-20. PubMed ID: 24930172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Uncertain Contact Location on Situation Awareness and Performance in Simulated Submarine Track Management.
    Loft S; Morrell DB; Ponton K; Braithwaite J; Bowden V; Huf S
    Hum Factors; 2016 Nov; 58(7):1052-1068. PubMed ID: 27283838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Where are you? The effect of uncertainty and its visual representation on location judgments in GPS-like displays.
    Hegarty M; Friedman A; Boone AP; Barrett TJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Dec; 22(4):381-392. PubMed ID: 27732032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of different graphical displays on nonexpert decision making under uncertainty.
    Padilla LM; Hansen G; Ruginski IT; Kramer HS; Thompson WB; Creem-Regehr SH
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Mar; 21(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25437794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhanced detection with bimodal sonar displays.
    Doll TJ; Hanna TE
    Hum Factors; 1989 Oct; 31(5):539-50. PubMed ID: 2625348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Continuously informing vibrotactile displays in support of attention management and multitasking in anesthesiology.
    Ferris TK; Sarter N
    Hum Factors; 2011 Dec; 53(6):600-11. PubMed ID: 22235523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Displaying uncertainty: investigating the effects of display format and specificity.
    Bisantz AM; Marsiglio SS; Munch J
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):777-96. PubMed ID: 16553066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing 2D vector field visualization methods: a user study.
    Laidlaw DH; Kirby RM; Jackson CD; Davidson JS; Miller TS; da Silva M; Warren WH; Tarr MJ
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2005; 11(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 15631129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance.
    Liu YC; Jhuang JW
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of uncertainty and diagnosticity on classification of multidimensional data with integral and separable displays of system status.
    Coury BG; Boulette MD; Smith RA
    Hum Factors; 1989 Oct; 31(5):551-69. PubMed ID: 2625349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Chronic Detrimental Impact of Interruptions in a Simulated Submarine Track Management Task.
    Loft S; Sadler A; Braithwaite J; Huf S
    Hum Factors; 2015 Dec; 57(8):1417-26. PubMed ID: 26314878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using scanpaths as a learning method for a conflict detection task of multiple target tracking.
    Kang Z; Landry SJ
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1150-62. PubMed ID: 25277023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expert judgement in a risk assessment model for Salmonella spp. in pork: the performance of different weighting schemes.
    Boone I; Van der Stede Y; Bollaerts K; Messens W; Vose D; Daube G; Aerts M; Mintiens K
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Nov; 92(3):224-34. PubMed ID: 19782415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative assessment of effects of visual scanning on concurrent task performance.
    Liu Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Mar; 39(3):382-99. PubMed ID: 8849492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Representation control increases task efficiency in complex graphical representations.
    Moritz J; Meyerhoff HS; Meyer-Dernbecher C; Schwan S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196420. PubMed ID: 29698443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART).
    Helton WS; Weil L; Middlemiss A; Sawers A
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 20138552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does display configuration affect information sampling performance?
    Brand JL; Orenstein HB
    Ergonomics; 1998 Mar; 41(3):286-301. PubMed ID: 9520626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using cognitive work analysis to design clinical displays.
    Effken J; Loeb R; Johnson K; Johnson S; Reyna V
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):127-31. PubMed ID: 11604719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of localized auditory information on visual target detection performance using a helmet-mounted display.
    Nelson WT; Hettinger LJ; Cunningham JA; Brickman BJ; Haas MW; McKinley RL
    Hum Factors; 1998 Sep; 40(3):452-60. PubMed ID: 9849103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reference frame congruency in search-and-rescue tasks.
    Pavlovic NJ; Keillor J; Hollands JG; Chignell MH
    Hum Factors; 2009 Apr; 51(2):240-50. PubMed ID: 19653486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.