These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24931529)

  • 1. Short communication: effects of milk removal on teat tissue and recovery in Murciano-Granadina goats.
    Alejandro M; Roca A; Romero G; Díaz JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(8):5012-6. PubMed ID: 24931529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How does the milk removal method affect teat tissue and teat recovery in dairy ewes?
    Alejandro M; Roca A; Romero G; Díaz JR
    J Dairy Res; 2014 Aug; 81(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 24914749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Machine milking-induced changes in teat canal dimensions as assessed by ultrasonography.
    Melvin JM; Heuwieser W; Virkler PD; Nydam DV; Wieland M
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2657-2669. PubMed ID: 30639026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the pulsation type (alternate or simultaneous) on milk yield and health status of the mammary gland of Murciano-Granadina goats.
    Bueso-Ródenas J; Romero G; Navarro A; Pérez E; Díaz JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3339-3347. PubMed ID: 30772030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An observational study investigating the association of ultrasonographically assessed machine milking-induced changes in teat condition and teat-end shape in dairy cows.
    Wieland M; Virkler PD; Borkowski AH; Älveby N; Wood P; Nydam DV
    Animal; 2019 Feb; 13(2):341-348. PubMed ID: 29925442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of milking technique and lactation on the bovine teat by means of ultrasonographic examination.
    Khol JL; Franz S; Klein D; Lexer D; Waiblinger S; Luger K; Baumgartner W
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006; 119(1-2):68-73. PubMed ID: 16450712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short communication: Teat wall diameter and teat tissue thickness in dairy cows are affected by intramammary pressure and by the mechanical forces of machine milking.
    Odorcic M; Blau U; Löfstrand J; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):884-889. PubMed ID: 31733859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in cisternal udder compartment induced by milking interval in dairy goats milked once or twice daily.
    Salama AA; Caja G; Such X; Peris S; Sorensen A; Knight CH
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 May; 87(5):1181-7. PubMed ID: 15290965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vacuum levels and milk-flow-dependent vacuum drops affect machine milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Besier J; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):3096-3102. PubMed ID: 26830741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A longitudinal prospective cohort study investigating the association of premilking stimulation and teat-end shape on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition in dairy cows.
    Wieland M; Melvin JM; Nydam DV; Virkler PD
    BMC Vet Res; 2019 Feb; 15(1):58. PubMed ID: 30755196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of a latency period between pre-stimulation and teat cup attachment and periodic vacuum reduction on milking characteristics and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Vetter A; van Dorland HA; Youssef M; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Res; 2014 Feb; 81(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 24433587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Milk flow-dependent vacuum loss in high-line milking systems: effects on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition.
    Ambord S; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Aug; 93(8):3588-94. PubMed ID: 20655427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different vacuum levels, vacuum reduction during low milk flow, and different cluster detachment levels affect milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Stauffer C; Feierabend M; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9250-9260. PubMed ID: 32747105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recovery of cow teats after milking as determined by ultrasonographic scanning.
    Neijenhuis F; Klungel GH; Hogeveen H
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Dec; 84(12):2599-606. PubMed ID: 11814016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Machine milking parameters for Murciano-Granadina breed goats.
    Fernández N; Martí JV; Rodríguez M; Peris C; Balasch S
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):507-513. PubMed ID: 31629519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of inner teat morphology by using high-resolution ultrasound: Changes due to milking and establishment of measurement traits of the distal teat canal.
    Martin LM; Stöcker C; Sauerwein H; Büscher W; Müller U
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8417-8428. PubMed ID: 29935835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of overmilking and liner type and characteristics on teat tissue in small ruminants.
    Alejandro M; Roca A; Romero G; Díaz JR
    J Dairy Res; 2014 May; 81(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 24594275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Review: Milking routines and cluster detachment levels in small ruminants.
    Dzidic A; Rovai M; Poulet JL; Leclerc M; Marnet PG
    Animal; 2019 Jul; 13(S1):s86-s93. PubMed ID: 31280744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review: Milking machine settings, teat condition and milking efficiency in dairy cows.
    Odorčić M; Rasmussen MD; Paulrud CO; Bruckmaier RM
    Animal; 2019 Jul; 13(S1):s94-s99. PubMed ID: 31280747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method for assessing teatcup liner performance during the peak milk flow period.
    Penry JF; Upton J; Leonardi S; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jan; 101(1):649-660. PubMed ID: 29102142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.