327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24932913)
1. Structure-based virtual screening approach for discovery of covalently bound ligands.
Toledo Warshaviak D; Golan G; Borrelli KW; Zhu K; Kalid O
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):1941-50. PubMed ID: 24932913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel inhibitor discovery through virtual screening against multiple protein conformations generated via ligand-directed modeling: a maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase example.
Mahasenan KV; Li C
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1345-55. PubMed ID: 22540736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Development of Target-Specific Pose Filter Ensembles To Boost Ligand Enrichment for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
Xia J; Hsieh JH; Hu H; Wu S; Wang XS
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jun; 57(6):1414-1425. PubMed ID: 28511009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Docking covalent inhibitors: a parameter free approach to pose prediction and scoring.
Zhu K; Borrelli KW; Greenwood JR; Day T; Abel R; Farid RS; Harder E
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):1932-40. PubMed ID: 24916536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protein tyrosine phosphatases: Ligand interaction analysis and optimisation of virtual screening.
Ghattas MA; Atatreh N; Bichenkova EV; Bryce RA
J Mol Graph Model; 2014 Jul; 52():114-23. PubMed ID: 25038507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Docking-based virtual screening of covalently binding ligands: an orthogonal lead discovery approach.
Schröder J; Klinger A; Oellien F; Marhöfer RJ; Duszenko M; Selzer PM
J Med Chem; 2013 Feb; 56(4):1478-90. PubMed ID: 23350811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ligand efficiency based approach for efficient virtual screening of compound libraries.
Ke YY; Coumar MS; Shiao HY; Wang WC; Chen CW; Song JS; Chen CH; Lin WH; Wu SH; Hsu JT; Chang CM; Hsieh HP
Eur J Med Chem; 2014 Aug; 83():226-35. PubMed ID: 24960626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Evaluation of Covalent Docking Tools.
Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jul; 58(7):1441-1458. PubMed ID: 29890081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
Brylinski M
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 7. Impact of protein flexibility and water molecules on docking-based virtual screening accuracy.
Therrien E; Weill N; Tomberg A; Corbeil CR; Lee D; Moitessier N
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3198-210. PubMed ID: 25280064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving VEGFR-2 docking-based screening by pharmacophore postfiltering and similarity search postprocessing.
Planesas JM; Claramunt RM; Teixidó J; Borrell JI; Pérez-Nueno VI
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Apr; 51(4):777-87. PubMed ID: 21417262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficient molecular docking of NMR structures: application to HIV-1 protease.
Huang SY; Zou X
Protein Sci; 2007 Jan; 16(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 17123961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
Huang SY; Zou X
Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CRDOCK: an ultrafast multipurpose protein-ligand docking tool.
Cortés Cabrera Á; Klett J; Dos Santos HG; Perona A; Gil-Redondo R; Francis SM; Priego EM; Gago F; Morreale A
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Aug; 52(8):2300-9. PubMed ID: 22764680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extended template-based modeling and evaluation method using consensus of binding mode of GPCRs for virtual screening.
Sato M; Hirokawa T
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3153-61. PubMed ID: 25350693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integrating ligand-based and protein-centric virtual screening of kinase inhibitors using ensembles of multiple protein kinase genes and conformations.
Dixit A; Verkhivker GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2501-15. PubMed ID: 22992037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
