These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24932913)

  • 21. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In silico fragment-based drug discovery: setup and validation of a fragment-to-lead computational protocol using S4MPLE.
    Hoffer L; Renaud JP; Horvath D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):836-51. PubMed ID: 23537132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. StructRank: a new approach for ligand-based virtual screening.
    Rathke F; Hansen K; Brefeld U; Müller KR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jan; 51(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 21166393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ranking targets in structure-based virtual screening of three-dimensional protein libraries: methods and problems.
    Kellenberger E; Foata N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1014-25. PubMed ID: 18412328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cosolvent-Based Protein Pharmacophore for Ligand Enrichment in Virtual Screening.
    Arcon JP; Defelipe LA; Lopez ED; Burastero O; Modenutti CP; Barril X; Marti MA; Turjanski AG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Aug; 59(8):3572-3583. PubMed ID: 31373819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. VS-APPLE: A Virtual Screening Algorithm Using Promiscuous Protein-Ligand Complexes.
    Okuno T; Kato K; Terada TP; Sasai M; Chikenji G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1108-19. PubMed ID: 26057716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discovery of new inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis InhA enzyme using virtual screening and a 3D-pharmacophore-based approach.
    Pauli I; dos Santos RN; Rostirolla DC; Martinelli LK; Ducati RG; Timmers LF; Basso LA; Santos DS; Guido RV; Andricopulo AD; Norberto de Souza O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Sep; 53(9):2390-401. PubMed ID: 23889525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rapid shape-based ligand alignment and virtual screening method based on atom/feature-pair similarities and volume overlap scoring.
    Sastry GM; Dixon SL; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21870862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.
    Forli S; Huey R; Pique ME; Sanner MF; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ
    Nat Protoc; 2016 May; 11(5):905-19. PubMed ID: 27077332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Structure-based virtual screening of MT2 melatonin receptor: influence of template choice and structural refinement.
    Pala D; Beuming T; Sherman W; Lodola A; Rivara S; Mor M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):821-35. PubMed ID: 23541165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inexpensive Method for Selecting Receptor Structures for Virtual Screening.
    Huang Z; Wong CF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jan; 56(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 26651874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. FINDSITE(comb): a threading/structure-based, proteomic-scale virtual ligand screening approach.
    Zhou H; Skolnick J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):230-40. PubMed ID: 23240691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Virtual fragment docking by Glide: a validation study on 190 protein-fragment complexes.
    Sándor M; Kiss R; Keseru GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1165-72. PubMed ID: 20459088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of Binding Pose and Modeled Structures on SVMGen and GlideScore Enrichment of Chemical Libraries.
    Xu D; Meroueh SO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1139-51. PubMed ID: 27154487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A systematic pipeline of protein structure selection for computer-aided drug discovery: A case study on T790M/L858R mutant EGFR structures.
    Das AP; Nandekar P; Mathur P; Agarwal SM
    Protein Sci; 2023 Sep; 32(9):e4740. PubMed ID: 37515373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of Shape Similarity in Pose Selection and Virtual Screening in CSARdock2014 Exercise.
    Kumar A; Zhang KY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):965-73. PubMed ID: 26247231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. SABRE: ligand/structure-based virtual screening approach using consensus molecular-shape pattern recognition.
    Wei NN; Hamza A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):338-46. PubMed ID: 24328054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.
    Brewerton SC
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 18428089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Target-specific native/decoy pose classifier improves the accuracy of ligand ranking in the CSAR 2013 benchmark.
    Fourches D; Politi R; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jan; 55(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 25521713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.