265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24933230)
1. Full-arch prostheses from translucent zirconia: accuracy of fit.
Sachs C; Groesser J; Stadelmann M; Schweiger J; Erdelt K; Beuer F
Dent Mater; 2014 Aug; 30(8):817-23. PubMed ID: 24933230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal fit of 14-unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers.
Beuer F; Neumeier P; Naumann M
J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 36(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 18976261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal and internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated from translucent multicolored zirconia: Framework versus complete contour design.
Ueda K; Watanabe F; Katsuta Y; Seto M; Ueno D; Hiroyasu K; Suzuki S; Erdelt K; Güth JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):340.e1-340.e6. PubMed ID: 33198991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems.
Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Li J; Borchers L; Stiesch M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19583762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study.
Büchi DL; Ebler S; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Quintessence Int; 2014; 45(10):837-46. PubMed ID: 25126636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal and internal fit of posterior three-unit fixed zirconia dental prostheses fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems and materials.
Schönberger J; Erdelt KJ; Bäumer D; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2629-2635. PubMed ID: 28160108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center.
Meirowitz A; Bitterman Y; Levy S; Mijiritsky E; Dolev E
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):103. PubMed ID: 31196041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Beuer F; Naumann M; Gernet W; Sorensen JA
Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Sep; 13(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 18769946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers.
Beuer F; Aggstaller H; Edelhoff D; Gernet W; Sorensen J
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18620749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Over Reverse Tapered Preparations.
Carbajal Mejía JB; Yatani H; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e477-e484. PubMed ID: 29194841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Dittmer MP; Borchers L; Stiesch M
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 37(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 20059649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
