These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24933230)

  • 21. Marginal and internal discrepancies of zirconia copings: effects of milling system and finish line design.
    Ribeiro IL; Campos F; Sousa RS; Alves ML; Rodrigues DM; Souza RO; Bottino MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 25961609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study.
    Rödiger M; Heinitz A; Bürgers R; Rinke S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):579-587. PubMed ID: 27469102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal and internal fit of three-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses: Effects of prosthesis design, cement space, and zirconia type.
    Suzuki S; Katsuta Y; Ueda K; Watanabe F
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Oct; 64(4):460-467. PubMed ID: 32276830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of tooth preparations for zirconia-based crowns and fixed dental prostheses using stereolithography data sets.
    Winkelmeyer C; Wolfart S; Marotti J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Nov; 116(5):783-789. PubMed ID: 27236595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal and internal fit of pre-sintered Co-Cr and zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses as measured using microcomputed tomography.
    Daou EE; Ounsi H; Özcan M; Al-Haj Husain N; Salameh Z
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):409-414. PubMed ID: 29724558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.
    Reich S; Kappe K; Teschner H; Schmitt J
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 19049530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
    Su TS; Sun J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of CAD/CAM and Conventional Cement Retained Implant-Supported Single Crowns.
    Nejatidanesh F; Shakibamehr AH; Savabi O
    Implant Dent; 2016 Feb; 25(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 26505132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions.
    Ueda K; Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Erdelt K; Keul C; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 26121970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Kale E; Cilli M; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Hybrid Abutment Assemblies After Central and Local Manufacturing, Respectively.
    Gehrke P; Sing T; Fischer C; Spintzyk S; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):808-814. PubMed ID: 30024996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks.
    Kunii J; Hotta Y; Tamaki Y; Ozawa A; Kobayashi Y; Fujishima A; Miyazaki T; Fujiwara T
    Dent Mater J; 2007 Nov; 26(6):820-6. PubMed ID: 18203487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of digitizing techniques on the fit of implant-retained crowns with different antirotational abutment features.
    Aktas G; Özcan N; Aydin DH; Şahin E; Akça K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 24360015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital evaluation of the effect of nanosilica-lithium spray coating on the internal and marginal fit of high translucent zirconia crowns.
    Liang S; Yuan F; Chen H; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104503. PubMed ID: 37001793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique.
    Mously HA; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 24795263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization--a laboratory study.
    Keul C; Stawarczyk B; Erdelt KJ; Beuer F; Edelhoff D; Güth JF
    Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):400-7. PubMed ID: 24522150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.