These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24933364)

  • 41. Carbon dioxide emissions from the electricity sector in major countries: a decomposition analysis.
    Li X; Liao H; Du YF; Wang C; Wang JW; Liu Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Mar; 25(7):6814-6825. PubMed ID: 29264859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assessment of thermal power plant CO
    Li C; Wang X; Ye H; Wu S; Shi H; An Y; Sun E
    Environ Pollut; 2024 Nov; 361():124886. PubMed ID: 39245203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Automated online measurement of N2, N2O, NO, CO2, and CH4 emissions based on a gas-flow-soil-core technique.
    Liao T; Wang R; Zheng X; Sun Y; Butterbach-Bahl K; Chen N
    Chemosphere; 2013 Nov; 93(11):2848-53. PubMed ID: 24184044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Selective detection and characterization of nanoparticles from motor vehicles.
    Johnston MV; Klems JP; Zordan CA; Pennington MR; Smith JN;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2013 Feb; (173):3-45. PubMed ID: 23614271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Systematic error and uncertain carbon dioxide emissions from U.S. power plants.
    Quick JC; Marland E
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 May; 69(5):646-658. PubMed ID: 30735479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Spatiotemporal Characteristics, Determinants and Scenario Analysis of CO2 Emissions in China Using Provincial Panel Data.
    Wang S; Fang C; Li G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138666. PubMed ID: 26397373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. CHARM-F-a new airborne integrated-path differential-absorption lidar for carbon dioxide and methane observations: measurement performance and quantification of strong point source emissions.
    Amediek A; Ehret G; Fix A; Wirth M; Büdenbender C; Quatrevalet M; Kiemle C; Gerbig C
    Appl Opt; 2017 Jun; 56(18):5182-5197. PubMed ID: 29047572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Industrial point source CO
    Carotenuto F; Gualtieri G; Miglietta F; Riccio A; Toscano P; Wohlfahrt G; Gioli B
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Feb; 190(3):165. PubMed ID: 29470656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Early atmospheric detection of carbon dioxide from carbon capture and storage sites.
    Pak NM; Rempillo O; Norman AL; Layzell DB
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):739-47. PubMed ID: 27111469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Energy consumption and CO
    Mirzaei M; Bekri M
    Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():345-351. PubMed ID: 28161426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. NO and NO2 emission ratios measured from in-use commercial aircraft during taxi and takeoff.
    Herndon SC; Shorter JH; Zahniser MS; Nelson DD; Jayne J; Brown RC; Miake-Lye RC; Waitz I; Silva P; Lanni T; Demerjian K; Kolb CE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Nov; 38(22):6078-84. PubMed ID: 15573610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A 2009 Mobile Source Carbon Dioxide Emissions Inventory for the University of Central Florida.
    Clifford JM; Cooper CD
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Sep; 62(9):1050-60. PubMed ID: 23019819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Remote real-time monitoring of subsurface landfill gas migration.
    Fay C; Doherty AR; Beirne S; Collins F; Foley C; Healy J; Kiernan BM; Lee H; Maher D; Orpen D; Phelan T; Qiu Z; Zhang K; Gurrin C; Corcoran B; O'Connor NE; Smeaton AF; Diamond D
    Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(7):6603-28. PubMed ID: 22163975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Real-time trace-level detection of carbon dioxide and ethylene in car exhaust gases.
    McCulloch MT; Langford N; Duxbury G
    Appl Opt; 2005 May; 44(14):2887-94. PubMed ID: 15943343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Laboratory testing of a continuous emissions monitor for hydrochloric acid.
    Dene C; Pisano JT; Durbin TD; Bumiller K; Crabbe K; Muzio LJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Jun; 64(6):670-8. PubMed ID: 25039201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Estimates of carbon dioxide emissions based on incomplete condition information: a case study of liquefied natural gas in China.
    Li L; Yang J; Cao Y; Wu J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(9):8847-8861. PubMed ID: 30715711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Hourly disaggregation of industrial CO
    Ma L; Cai B; Wu F; Zeng H
    Environ Pollut; 2018 May; 236():396-404. PubMed ID: 29414363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Mobile laboratory with rapid response instruments for real-time measurements of urban and regional trace gas and particulate distributions and emission source characteristics.
    Kolb CE; Herndon SC; McManus JB; Shorter JH; Zahniser MS; Nelson DD; Jayne JT; Canagaratna MR; Worsnop DR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Nov; 38(21):5694-703. PubMed ID: 15575289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of CO2 emission between COREX and blast furnace iron-making system.
    Hu C; Han X; Li Z; Zhang C
    J Environ Sci (China); 2009; 21 Suppl 1():S116-20. PubMed ID: 25084406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of 2-
    Singh UN; Refaat TF; Petros M; Ismail S
    IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens; 2018 Jun; 11(6):2059-2067. PubMed ID: 33376571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.