225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24933616)
21. Suffix effects and intrusion errors in young and elderly subjects.
Greenhut-Wertz J; Manning SK
Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(2):173-90. PubMed ID: 7628510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Temporal-contextual processing in working memory: evidence from delayed cued recall and delayed free recall tests.
Loaiza VM; McCabe DP
Mem Cognit; 2012 Feb; 40(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 21948350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.
Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):890-910. PubMed ID: 26752731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.
Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C
Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 2266866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Association of Sleep Quality on Memory-Related Executive Functions in Middle Age.
Rana BK; Panizzon MS; Franz CE; Spoon KM; Jacobson KC; Xian H; Ancoli-Israel S; Lyons M; Kremen WS
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2018 Jan; 24(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 28760172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.
Mallett R; Lewis-Peacock JA
Cortex; 2019 Dec; 121():225-238. PubMed ID: 31629945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A neural model of retrospective attention in visual working memory.
Bays PM; Taylor R
Cogn Psychol; 2018 Feb; 100():43-52. PubMed ID: 29272732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Suffix interference in the recall of linguistically coherent speech.
Balota DA; Cowan N; Engle RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):446-56. PubMed ID: 2140403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The modality effect and echoic persistence.
Watkins OC; Watkins MJ
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):251-78. PubMed ID: 6447188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Recall cues interfere with retrieval from visuospatial working memory.
Tabi YA; Husain M; Manohar SG
Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):288-305. PubMed ID: 30604426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding.
Beck VM; Hollingworth A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1190-6. PubMed ID: 26191616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of encoding instruction and opportunity on the recollection of behaviourally relevant events.
Broitman AW; Swallow KM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):711-725. PubMed ID: 31747827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Benefit of enactment over oral repetition of verbal instruction does not require additional working memory during encoding.
Yang T; Gathercole SE; Allen RJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):186-92. PubMed ID: 23817922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spatiotemporal proximity effects in visual short-term memory examined by target-nontarget analysis.
Sapkota RP; Pardhan S; van der Linde I
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1304-15. PubMed ID: 26844581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The death of recency: Relationship between end-state comfort and serial position effects in serial recall: Logan and Fischman (2011) revisited.
Logan SW; Fischman MG
Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Dec; 44():11-21. PubMed ID: 26298213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Are there multiple ways to direct attention in working memory?
Atkinson AL; Berry EDJ; Waterman AH; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Allen RJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):115-126. PubMed ID: 29635690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reward associations impact both iconic and visual working memory.
Infanti E; Hickey C; Turatto M
Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():22-9. PubMed ID: 25481632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The power law of visual working memory characterizes attention engagement.
Smith PL; Corbett EA; Lilburn SD; Kyllingsbæk S
Psychol Rev; 2018 Apr; 125(3):435-451. PubMed ID: 29733667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evidence for attentional gradient in the serial position memory curve from event-related potentials.
Azizian A; Polich J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):2071-81. PubMed ID: 17892393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
