These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24933616)

  • 41. Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account.
    Vergauwe E; Barrouillet P; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1012-28. PubMed ID: 19586267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Selectively Distracted: Divided Attention and Memory for Important Information.
    Middlebrooks CD; Kerr T; Castel AD
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1103-1115. PubMed ID: 28604267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Using response time distributions and race models to characterize primacy and recency effects in free recall initiation.
    Osth AF; Farrell S
    Psychol Rev; 2019 Jul; 126(4):578-609. PubMed ID: 30998031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Location-independent feature binding in visual working memory for sequentially presented objects.
    Schneegans S; Harrison WJ; Bays PM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2377-2393. PubMed ID: 33864204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The influence of time on task on mind wandering and visual working memory.
    Krimsky M; Forster DE; Llabre MM; Jha AP
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():84-90. PubMed ID: 28865286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Remember some or remember all? Ageing and strategy effects in visual working memory.
    Atkinson AL; Baddeley AD; Allen RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jul; 71(7):1561-1573. PubMed ID: 28812424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Visual working memory phenomena based on categorical tasks replicate using a continuous measure: A simple interpretation and some methodological considerations.
    Hu Y; Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1733-1745. PubMed ID: 36754918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Retaining event files in working memory requires extra object-based attention than the constituent elements.
    Lu X; Ma X; Zhao Y; Gao Z; Shen M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2225-2239. PubMed ID: 30862248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings.
    Pratt J; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):835-45. PubMed ID: 14585008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Covert retrieval in working memory impacts the phenomenological characteristics remembered during episodic memory.
    Loaiza VM; Borovanska BM
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Jan; 57():20-32. PubMed ID: 29156216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Pointing movements both impair and improve visuospatial working memory depending on serial position.
    Rossi-Arnaud C; Longobardi E; Spataro P
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Aug; 45(6):903-915. PubMed ID: 28361382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Recency effect in anterograde amnesia: evidence for distinct memory stores underlying enhanced retrieval of terminal items in immediate and delayed recall paradigms.
    Carlesimo GA; Marfia GA; Loasses A; Caltagirone C
    Neuropsychologia; 1996 Mar; 34(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 8868275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The limits of visual working memory in children: Exploring prioritization and recency effects with sequential presentation.
    Berry EDJ; Waterman AH; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Allen RJ
    Dev Psychol; 2018 Feb; 54(2):240-253. PubMed ID: 29154649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Age differences and format effects in working memory.
    Foos PW; Goolkasian P
    Exp Aging Res; 2010 Jul; 36(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 20544448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Echoic and retrieval accounts of the long-term modality effect tested using the suffix procedure.
    Huang ST; Glenberg AM
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(4):453-70. PubMed ID: 3812815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An interference model for visual and verbal working memory.
    Oberauer K; Lin HY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jun; 50(6):858-888. PubMed ID: 37982790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
    Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Does constraining memory maintenance reduce visual search efficiency?
    Buttaccio DR; Lange ND; Thomas RP; Dougherty MR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):605-621. PubMed ID: 27967335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Working memory, attention, and executive function in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.
    Stopford CL; Thompson JC; Neary D; Richardson AM; Snowden JS
    Cortex; 2012 Apr; 48(4):429-46. PubMed ID: 21237452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Response suppression contributes to recency in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Oct; 40(7):1070-80. PubMed ID: 22555889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.