289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24933697)
1. Sleep can reduce the testing effect: it enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected.
Bäuml KH; Holterman C; Abel M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1568-81. PubMed ID: 24933697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sleep reduces the testing effect-But not after corrective feedback and prolonged retention interval.
Abel M; Haller V; Köck H; Pötschke S; Heib D; Schabus M; Bäuml KT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):272-287. PubMed ID: 29698042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrieval practice can insulate items against intralist interference: Evidence from the list-length effect, output interference, and retrieval-induced forgetting.
Kliegl O; Bäuml KH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Feb; 42(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 26301963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrieval-induced forgetting, delay, and sleep.
Abel M; Bäuml KH
Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):420-8. PubMed ID: 22640487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrieval practice can eliminate list method directed forgetting.
Abel M; Bäuml KH
Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 26286882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
Halamish V; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.
Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
Memory; 2015; 23(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 24579674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The two faces of selective memory retrieval: recall specificity of the detrimental but not the beneficial effect.
Bäuml KH; Dobler IM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):246-53. PubMed ID: 24707790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: competitor interference revisited.
Verde MF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1433-48. PubMed ID: 23687918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information.
Antony JW; Paller KA
Learn Mem; 2018 Jun; 25(6):258-263. PubMed ID: 29764971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The negative testing and negative generation effects are eliminated by delay.
Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1014-25. PubMed ID: 25329076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sleep can eliminate list-method directed forgetting.
Abel M; Bäuml KH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):946-52. PubMed ID: 23088545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sleep can reduce proactive interference.
Abel M; Bäuml KH
Memory; 2014; 22(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 23556992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format.
Abel M; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 27464491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selective restudy can reset recall of forgotten information.
Trißl L; Bäuml KT
Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2202-2210. PubMed ID: 35715684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing the limits of testing effects using completion tests.
Hinze SR; Wiley J
Memory; 2011 Apr; 19(3):290-304. PubMed ID: 21500089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of testing on subsequent re-encoding and long-term forgetting of action-relevant materials: On the influence of recall type.
Kubik V; Nilsson LG; Olofsson JK; Jönsson FU
Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 26243692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrieval-induced forgetting: dynamic effects between retrieval and restudy trials when practice is mixed.
Dobler IM; Bäuml KH
Mem Cognit; 2013 May; 41(4):547-57. PubMed ID: 23283807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect.
Veltre MT; Cho KW; Neely JH
Memory; 2015; 23(8):1229-37. PubMed ID: 25345914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
