These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. How to improve statistical analysis in parasitology research publications. Morrison DA Int J Parasitol; 2002 Jul; 32(8):1065-70. PubMed ID: 12076635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Statistics by zooth. A primer. Schork MA N Y State Dent J; 2007; 73(5):30-7. PubMed ID: 17969477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Discrimination and interpretation of errors of experimental designs in medical papers]. Hu LP; Liu HG Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2007 Nov; 5(6):707-11. PubMed ID: 17997952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Dropouts and missing data in psychiatric clinical trials. Potkin SG; Siu CO Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 166(11):1295; author reply 1295-6. PubMed ID: 19884237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Two-tailed tests and a statistical significance at 0.05: what do they mean? Campbell M Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 15177857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Standardising the methodology of research into chronic wounds. Fletcher J Prof Nurse; 2003 Apr; 18(8):455-7. PubMed ID: 12715538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Avoid lost discoveries, because of violations of standard assumptions, by using modern robust statistical methods. Wilcox R; Carlson M; Azen S; Clark F J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 23195918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Potential errors and misuse of statistics in studies on leakage in endodontics. Lucena C; Lopez JM; Pulgar R; Abalos C; Valderrama MJ Int Endod J; 2013 Apr; 46(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 22958068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Practical research methods for orthopaedic surgeons. Dowrick AS; Tornetta P; Obremskey WT; Dirschl DR; Bhandari M J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Feb; 94(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 22336979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Summaries for patients. Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding. Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jan; 136(2):I47. PubMed ID: 11928736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Suggested statistical standards for NTT manuscripts: notes from two of your reviewers. Bookstein FL; Sampson PD Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2005; 27(3):407-15. PubMed ID: 15939201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dichotomy in post-genomic microbiology. Felis GE; Molenaar D; Dellaglio F; van Hylckama Vlieg JE Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Aug; 25(8):848-9. PubMed ID: 17687355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. "Statistics" is not a sausage machine: a statistician's viewpoint and some comments on experimental design. Gaines Das RE Altern Lab Anim; 2004 Sep; 32 Suppl 2():5-8. PubMed ID: 15601219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Why most published research findings are false: problems in the analysis. Goodman S; Greenland S PLoS Med; 2007 Apr; 4(4):e168. PubMed ID: 17456002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]