BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24934487)

  • 1. A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology.
    Luke B; Brown MB; Wantman E; Stern JE; Baker VL; Widra E; Coddington CC; Gibbons WE; Ball GD
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):744-52. PubMed ID: 24934487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.
    Luke B; Brown MB; Wantman E; Stern JE; Baker VL; Widra E; Coddington CC; Gibbons WE; Van Voorhis BJ; Ball GD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):676.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25683965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer.
    Luke B; Brown MB; Missmer SA; Spector LG; Leach RE; Williams M; Koch L; Smith YR; Stern JE; Ball GD; Schymura MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 26577302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology.
    Luke B; Brown MB; Stern JE; Jindal SK; Racowsky C; Ball GD
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1338-44. PubMed ID: 25217871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Second try: who returns for additional assisted reproductive technology treatment and the effect of a prior assisted reproductive technology birth.
    Luke B; Brown MB; Wantman E; Baker VL; Grow DR; Stern JE
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Dec; 100(6):1580-4. PubMed ID: 23987515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cumulative live birth rates with autologous oocytes plateau with fewer number of cycles for each year of age > 42.
    Seifer DB; Wang SF; Frankfurter D
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 Oct; 21(1):94. PubMed ID: 37872609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicted probabilities of live birth following assisted reproductive technology using United States national surveillance data from 2016 to 2018.
    Gaskins AJ; Zhang Y; Chang J; Kissin DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 May; 228(5):557.e1-557.e10. PubMed ID: 36702210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of using donor sperm in assisted reproductive technology cycles on perinatal outcomes.
    Yu B; Fritz R; Xie X; Negassa A; Jindal S; Vega M; Buyuk E
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Dec; 110(7):1285-1289. PubMed ID: 30503127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calculating cumulative live-birth rates from linked cycles of assisted reproductive technology (ART): data from the Massachusetts SART CORS.
    Stern JE; Brown MB; Luke B; Wantman E; Lederman A; Missmer SA; Hornstein MD
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Sep; 94(4):1334-1340. PubMed ID: 19596309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of ICSI in IVF cycles in women with tubal ligation does not improve pregnancy or live birth rates.
    Grimstad FW; Nangia AK; Luke B; Stern JE; Mak W
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2750-2755. PubMed ID: 27738114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diminished ovarian reserve in the United States assisted reproductive technology population: diagnostic trends among 181,536 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System.
    Devine K; Mumford SL; Wu M; DeCherney AH; Hill MJ; Propst A
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Sep; 104(3):612-19.e3. PubMed ID: 26049057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting the Likelihood of Live Birth in Assisted Reproductive Technology According to the Number of Oocytes Retrieved and Female Age Using a Generalized Additive Model: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 17,948 Cycles.
    Zhu H; Zhao C; Xiao P; Zhang S
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():606231. PubMed ID: 33995268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention.
    Kissin DM; Kulkarni AD; Mneimneh A; Warner L; Boulet SL; Crawford S; Jamieson DJ;
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):954-61. PubMed ID: 25637480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient and cycle characteristics predicting high pregnancy rates with single-embryo transfer: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes between 2004 and 2013.
    Mersereau J; Stanhiser J; Coddington C; Jones T; Luke B; Brown MB
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):750-756. PubMed ID: 28923285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential impact of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on live birth rate in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System study.
    Gerber RS; Fazzari M; Kappy M; Cohen A; Galperin S; Lieman H; Jindal S; Buyuk E
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Dec; 114(6):1225-1231. PubMed ID: 33012553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.