These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials. Kunz R; Vist G; Oxman AD Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000012. PubMed ID: 17443633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. Robinson EJ; Kerr CE; Stevens AJ; Lilford RJ; Braunholtz DA; Edwards SJ; Beck SR; Rowley MG Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(8):1-192, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15763039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. Kunz R; Oxman AD BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7167):1185-90. PubMed ID: 9794851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Schulz KF; Grimes DA Lancet; 2002 Feb; 359(9305):515-9. PubMed ID: 11853818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial. Featherstone K; Donovan JL BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7167):1177-80. PubMed ID: 9794849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound versus 'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women. Brown J; Buckingham K; Buckett W; Abou-Setta AM Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 3():CD006107. PubMed ID: 26984325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of balanced and random allocation in clinical trials: a simulation study. Rovers MM; Straatman H; Zielhuis GA Eur J Epidemiol; 2000; 16(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 11484801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering. Schulz KF; Grimes DA Lancet; 2002 Feb; 359(9306):614-8. PubMed ID: 11867132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable? Kerr C; Robinson E; Stevens A; Braunholtz D; Edwards S; Lilford R J Med Ethics; 2004 Feb; 30(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 14872081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the influence of randomisation sequence generation and allocation concealment on treatment effects of physical therapy trials? A meta-epidemiological study. Armijo-Olivo S; Saltaji H; da Costa BR; Fuentes J; Ha C; Cummings GG BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008562. PubMed ID: 26338841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of randomisation in clinical trials: a survey of UK practice. McPherson GC; Campbell MK; Elbourne DR Trials; 2012 Oct; 13():198. PubMed ID: 23101457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sequential balancing: a simple method for treatment allocation in clinical trials. Borm GF; Hoogendoorn EH; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Dec; 26(6):637-45. PubMed ID: 16226925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials. Robinson EJ; Kerr C; Stevens A; Lilford R; Braunholtz D; Edwards S Soc Sci Med; 2004 Feb; 58(4):811-24. PubMed ID: 14672595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Randomised phase II trials in oncology]. Piedbois P Bull Cancer; 2007 Nov; 94(11):953-6. PubMed ID: 18055312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How to do random allocation (randomization). Kim J; Shin W Clin Orthop Surg; 2014 Mar; 6(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 24605197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unequal group sizes in randomised trials: guarding against guessing. Schulz KF; Grimes DA Lancet; 2002 Mar; 359(9310):966-70. PubMed ID: 11918933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]