These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2493491)

  • 1. Inhibition of bacterial growth under composite restorations following GLUMA pretreatment.
    Felton D; Bergenholtz G; Cox CF
    J Dent Res; 1989 Mar; 68(3):491-5. PubMed ID: 2493491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monkey pulp reactions to cavities treated with Gluma Dentin Bond and restored with a microfilled composite.
    Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Scand J Dent Res; 1987 Aug; 95(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 3114871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bonding of dentin adhesives in clinically-simulated occlusal resin composite restorations.
    Terkla LG; Mitchem JC; Mahler DB
    Am J Dent; 1991 Oct; 4(5):214-8. PubMed ID: 1810329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects on the dental pulp of a composite resin and two dentine bonding agents and associated bacterial microleakage.
    Grieve AR; Alani A; Saunders WP
    Int Endod J; 1991 May; 24(3):108-18. PubMed ID: 1778623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A 3-year evaluation of Gluma and Gluma/Scotchbond for restoration of cervical erosions.
    van Dijken JW
    Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Aug; 98(4):341-4. PubMed ID: 2119052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of GLUMA and GLUMA/Scotchbond on in vivo marginal adaptation of a composite resin to dentin.
    van Dijken JW; Horstedt P
    Dent Mater; 1989 May; 5(3):165-7. PubMed ID: 2517745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent.
    Hansen EK
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1989 Oct; 47(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 2531531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects on pulp tissue of microleakage in resin composite restorations.
    Sasafuchi Y; Otsuki M; Inokoshi S; Tagami J
    J Med Dent Sci; 1999 Dec; 46(4):155-64. PubMed ID: 12160253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal bacterial leakage and pulp reactions in Class II composite resin restorations in vivo.
    Lundin SA; Norén JG; Warfvinge J
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(4):185-92. PubMed ID: 2124006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histopathological response of infected cavities treated with Gluma and Scotchbond dentin bonding agents.
    Cox CF; Felton D; Bergenholtz G
    Am J Dent; 1988 Sep; 1 Spec No():189-94. PubMed ID: 3150282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulpal reaction and microorganisms under Clearfil Composite Resin in deep cavities with acid etched dentin.
    Torstenson B; Nordenvall KJ; Brännström M
    Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(4):167-76. PubMed ID: 6960501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Gluma desensitization on dentin bond strength.
    Reinhardt JW; Stephens NH; Fortin D
    Am J Dent; 1995 Aug; 8(4):170-2. PubMed ID: 7576381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage with Gluma: effects of unfilled resin polymerization and storage time.
    Hansen SE; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 1989 Oct; 2(5):266-8. PubMed ID: 2517873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical evaluation about restoration for cervical wedge-shaped defects of teeth using composite and dentin bonding].
    Ji A; Wang J
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1996 Jul; 31(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 9592270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enamel and dentin bond strength and bonding mechanism to dentin of Gluma CPS to primary teeth.
    Fritz U; García-Godoy F; Finger WJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9096816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of Gluma Bond, Scotchbond 2 and a glass ionomer/composite sandwich technique.
    Reeves GW; Fitchie JG; Scarbrough AR; Hembree JH
    Am J Dent; 1990 Oct; 3(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 2127533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentin-polymer bond established by Gluma and tested by thermal stress.
    Munksgaard EC; Irie M
    Scand J Dent Res; 1987 Apr; 95(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 3105043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.