270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24935150)
41. Virtual topological optimisation of scaffolds for rapid prototyping.
Almeida Hde A; Bártolo PJ
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Sep; 32(7):775-82. PubMed ID: 20620093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A dynamical study of the mechanical stimuli and tissue differentiation within a CaP scaffold based on micro-CT finite element models.
Sandino C; Lacroix D
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Jul; 10(4):565-76. PubMed ID: 20865437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Finite element method (FEM), mechanobiology and biomimetic scaffolds in bone tissue engineering.
Boccaccio A; Ballini A; Pappalettere C; Tullo D; Cantore S; Desiate A
Int J Biol Sci; 2011 Jan; 7(1):112-32. PubMed ID: 21278921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Parametric finite element analysis of physical stimuli resulting from mechanical stimulation of tissue engineered cartilage.
Babalola OM; Bonassar LJ
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jun; 131(6):061014. PubMed ID: 19449968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Finite element analysis of a personalized femoral scaffold with designed microarchitecture.
Pandithevan P; Kumar GS
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(7):877-89. PubMed ID: 20839655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Biomimetically mineralized salmon collagen scaffolds for application in bone tissue engineering.
Hoyer B; Bernhardt A; Heinemann S; Stachel I; Meyer M; Gelinsky M
Biomacromolecules; 2012 Apr; 13(4):1059-66. PubMed ID: 22364350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Integrating finite element modelling and 3D printing to engineer biomimetic polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering.
Schipani R; Nolan DR; Lally C; Kelly DJ
Connect Tissue Res; 2020 Mar; 61(2):174-189. PubMed ID: 31495233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Mechanical characterization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds.
Harley BA; Leung JH; Silva EC; Gibson LJ
Acta Biomater; 2007 Jul; 3(4):463-74. PubMed ID: 17349829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of naturally derived and synthetic scaffolds for urethral reconstruction.
Feng C; Xu YM; Fu Q; Zhu WD; Cui L; Chen J
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jul; 94(1):317-25. PubMed ID: 20166222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Modeling material-degradation-induced elastic property of tissue engineering scaffolds.
Bawolin NK; Li MG; Chen XB; Zhang WJ
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Nov; 132(11):111001. PubMed ID: 21034142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Characterization of biodegradable polyurethane microfibers for tissue engineering.
Rockwood DN; Woodhouse KA; Fromstein JD; Chase DB; Rabolt JF
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2007; 18(6):743-58. PubMed ID: 17623555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Modeling, Assessment, and Design of Porous Cells Based on Schwartz Primitive Surface for Bone Scaffolds.
Ambu R; Morabito AE
ScientificWorldJournal; 2019; 2019():7060847. PubMed ID: 31346324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Load-adaptive scaffold architecturing: a bioinspired approach to the design of porous additively manufactured scaffolds with optimized mechanical properties.
Rainer A; Giannitelli SM; Accoto D; De Porcellinis S; Guglielmelli E; Trombetta M
Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 40(4):966-75. PubMed ID: 22109804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Synthesis, characterization and surface modification of low moduli poly(ether carbonate urethane)ureas for soft tissue engineering.
Wang F; Li Z; Lannutti JL; Wagner WR; Guan J
Acta Biomater; 2009 Oct; 5(8):2901-12. PubMed ID: 19433136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Additive manufacturing and mechanical characterization of graded porosity scaffolds designed based on triply periodic minimal surface architectures.
Afshar M; Anaraki AP; Montazerian H; Kadkhodapour J
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():481-494. PubMed ID: 27281165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Synthesis, microstructure and mechanical properties of porous Mg--Zn scaffolds.
Seyedraoufi ZS; Mirdamadi Sh
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 May; 21():1-8. PubMed ID: 23454363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Degradable amorphous scaffolds with enhanced mechanical properties and homogeneous cell distribution produced by a three-dimensional fiber deposition method.
Sun Y; Finne-Wistrand A; Albertsson AC; Xing Z; Mustafa K; Hendrikson WJ; Grijpma DW; Moroni L
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2012 Oct; 100(10):2739-49. PubMed ID: 22623412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Finite element predictions compared to experimental results for the effective modulus of bone tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by selective laser sintering.
Cahill S; Lohfeld S; McHugh PE
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2009 Jun; 20(6):1255-62. PubMed ID: 19199109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The effect of scaffold architecture on properties of direct 3D fiber deposition of porous Ti6Al4V for orthopedic implants.
Li JP; de Wijn JR; van Blitterswijk CA; de Groot K
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jan; 92(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 19165798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The anisotropic elastic behavior of the widely-used triply-periodic minimal surface based scaffolds.
Lu Y; Zhao W; Cui Z; Zhu H; Wu C
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Nov; 99():56-65. PubMed ID: 31344523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
