BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2493552)

  • 1. Advance directives and the refusal of treatment.
    Hackler C
    Med Law; 1989; 7(5):457-65. PubMed ID: 2493552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The purpose of advance medical planning--autonomy for patients or limitation of care?
    Levinsky NG
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Sep; 335(10):741-3. PubMed ID: 8703178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The right to die.
    Powell JA; Cohen AS
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 7960664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond Cruzan: individual rights, family autonomy and the persistent vegetative state.
    Arras JD
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1991 Oct; 39(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 1918774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reconciling autonomy and the value of life.
    Bopp J
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):600-2. PubMed ID: 2332579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thunder from California: the Thor decision and the ever-expanding right to die.
    Brown LC; Paine SJ
    Healthspan; 1993 Oct; 10(9):13-7. PubMed ID: 10183992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH
    Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Against the right to die.
    Velleman JD
    J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):665-81. PubMed ID: 1479311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live".
    Kamisar Y
    Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The right to die: progress and peril.
    Capron AM
    Euthan Rev; 1987; 2(1 2):41-59. PubMed ID: 11649218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical issues and the right to die.
    Flarey DL
    Lippincotts Case Manag; 2005; 10(5):228-31. PubMed ID: 16205203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of the euthanasia debate in Australia.
    Magnusson R
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 1996 Dec; 20(4):1108-42. PubMed ID: 11657522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model Aid-in-Dying Act.
    Brandt CA
    Iowa Law Rev; 1989 Oct; 75(1):125-215. PubMed ID: 11650935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Refusals of treatment and requests for death.
    Beauchamp TL
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1996 Dec; 6(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 10164114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The duty to care--the right to refuse. Changing roles of patients and physicians in end-of-life decision making.
    Garwin M
    J Leg Med; 1998 Mar; 19(1):99-125. PubMed ID: 9564096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Active voluntary euthanasia: a needless Pandora's box.
    Shewmon DA
    Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):219-44. PubMed ID: 3450679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical and legal issues in the care of the elderly cancer patient.
    Thomasma DC
    Clin Geriatr Med; 1987 Aug; 3(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 3308049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Active euthanasia: can it be justified?
    Molenda FA
    Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does autonomy require informed and specific refusal of life-sustaining medical treatment?
    Bradley GV; Rouse F
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(3):301-35. PubMed ID: 2613492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Right to die" -- good slogan, fuzzy thinking.
    Kamisar Y
    First Things; 1993 Dec; 38():6-9. PubMed ID: 11654085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.