These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

563 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24935670)

  • 1. A new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives.
    Sargolzaei M; Chesnais JP; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):478. PubMed ID: 24935670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods of tagSNP selection and other variables affecting imputation accuracy in swine.
    Badke YM; Bates RO; Ernst CW; Schwab C; Fix J; Van Tassell CP; Steibel JP
    BMC Genet; 2013 Feb; 14():8. PubMed ID: 23433396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic selection using low density marker panels with application to a sire line in pigs.
    Wellmann R; Preuß S; Tholen E; Heinkel J; Wimmers K; Bennewitz J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):28. PubMed ID: 23895218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
    Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different methods for imputing genome-wide marker genotypes in Swedish and Finnish Red Cattle.
    Ma P; Brøndum RF; Zhang Q; Lund MS; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jul; 96(7):4666-77. PubMed ID: 23684022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of different algorithms for phasing haplotypes using Holstein cattle genotypes and pedigree data.
    Miar Y; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2837-2849. PubMed ID: 28161175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imputation of high-density genotypes in the Fleckvieh cattle population.
    Pausch H; Aigner B; Emmerling R; Edel C; Götz KU; Fries R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Feb; 45(1):3. PubMed ID: 23406470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.
    Khatkar MS; Moser G; Hayes BJ; Raadsma HW
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Oct; 13():538. PubMed ID: 23043356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.
    Sollero BP; Howard JT; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2780-2792. PubMed ID: 31115442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genotype Imputation To Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Farmed Atlantic Salmon.
    Tsai HY; Matika O; Edwards SM; Antolín-Sánchez R; Hamilton A; Guy DR; Tinch AE; Gharbi K; Stear MJ; Taggart JB; Bron JE; Hickey JM; Houston RD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Apr; 7(4):1377-1383. PubMed ID: 28250015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattle.
    Carvalheiro R; Boison SA; Neves HH; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS; Utsunomiya YT; O'Brien AM; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):69. PubMed ID: 25927950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fast imputation using medium or low-coverage sequence data.
    VanRaden PM; Sun C; O'Connell JR
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():82. PubMed ID: 26168789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of reference population on accuracy of imputation from 6K to 50K single nucleotide polymorphism chips in purebred and crossbreed beef cattle.
    Ventura RV; Lu D; Schenkel FS; Wang Z; Li C; Miller SP
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1433-44. PubMed ID: 24663187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imputation of ungenotyped parental genotypes in dairy and beef cattle from progeny genotypes.
    Berry DP; McParland S; Kearney JF; Sargolzaei M; Mullen MP
    Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 24840560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
    Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
    Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of recombination events, haplotype reconstruction and imputation of sires using half-sib SNP genotypes.
    Ferdosi MH; Kinghorn BP; van der Werf JH; Gondro C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):11. PubMed ID: 24495596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concordance rate between copy number variants detected using either high- or medium-density single nucleotide polymorphism genotype panels and the potential of imputing copy number variants from flanking high density single nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes in cattle.
    Rafter P; Gormley IC; Parnell AC; Kearney JF; Berry DP
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):205. PubMed ID: 32131735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations.
    Antolín R; Nettelblad C; Gorjanc G; Money D; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):30. PubMed ID: 28253858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A phasing and imputation method for pedigreed populations that results in a single-stage genomic evaluation.
    Hickey JM; Kinghorn BP; Tier B; van der Werf JH; Cleveland MA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jun; 44(1):9. PubMed ID: 22462519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.
    Grossi DA; Brito LF; Jafarikia M; Schenkel FS; Feng Z
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2235-2245. PubMed ID: 29706144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.