BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24935738)

  • 1. Trocar-sharpened needles for image-guided prostate biopsy improve sample quality and performance: first clinical results.
    Simpfendörfer T; Kuru TH; Steinemann S; Bergsträsser C; Block S; Roth W; Roethke MC; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Endourol; 2014 Nov; 28(11):1384-8. PubMed ID: 24935738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving accuracy in image-guided prostate biopsy by using trocar-sharpened needles.
    Kuru TH; Simpfendörfer T; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    Urol Int; 2013; 91(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 23838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: comparison of diagnostic specimen quality with 18 G and 16 G biopsy needles.
    Durmus T; Goldmann U; Baur AD; Huppertz A; Schwenke C; Hamm B; Franiel T
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e749-54. PubMed ID: 24034834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
    Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deflection Analysis of Different Needle Designs for Prostate Biopsy and Focal Therapy.
    Stone NN; Mouraviev V; Schechter D; Goetz J; Lucia MS; Smith EE; Crawford ED
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Oct; 16(5):654-661. PubMed ID: 27708117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for prostate cancer: Quantifying the impact of needle delivery error on diagnosis.
    Martin PR; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Fenster A; Ward AD
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):073504. PubMed ID: 24989418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies of Bone Lesions Without Cortical Disruption Using Fusion Imaging and Needle Tracking: Proof of Concept.
    Garnon J; Koch G; Tsoumakidou G; Caudrelier J; Chari B; Cazzato RL; Gangi A
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2017 Aug; 40(8):1267-1273. PubMed ID: 28357575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy allows for equivalent cancer detection with significantly fewer needle cores in biopsy-naive men.
    Yarlagadda VK; Lai WS; Gordetsky JB; Porter KK; Nix JW; Thomas JV; Rais-Bahrami S
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(3):115-120. PubMed ID: 29770762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
    Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies.
    Filson CP; Natarajan S; Margolis DJ; Huang J; Lieu P; Dorey FJ; Reiter RE; Marks LS
    Cancer; 2016 Mar; 122(6):884-92. PubMed ID: 26749141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The 3DBiopsy Prostate Biopsy System: Preclinical Investigation of a Needle, Actuator, and Specimen Collection Device Allowing Sampling of Individualized Prostate Lengths Between 20 and 60 mm.
    Stone NN; Mouraviev V; Schechter D; Lucia MS; Smith EE; Arangua P; Hoenemeyer J; Rosa J; Bawa R; Crawford ED
    Urology; 2017 Sep; 107():257-261. PubMed ID: 28601561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of real-time elastography on magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsies.
    Brock M; Löppenberg B; Roghmann F; Pelzer A; Dickmann M; Becker W; Martin-Seidel P; Sommerer F; Schenk L; Palisaar RJ; Noldus J; von Bodman C
    J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1191-7. PubMed ID: 25451832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging-directed transperineal limited-mapping prostatic biopsies to diagnose prostate cancer: a Scottish experience.
    Mukherjee A; Morton S; Fraser S; Salmond J; Baxter G; Leung HY
    Scott Med J; 2014 Nov; 59(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 25314954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Histopathologic quality of prostate core biopsy specimens: comparison of an MR-compatible biopsy needle and a ferromagnetic biopsy needle used for ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy].
    Franiel T; Fritzsche F; Staack A; Rost J; Hamm B; Beyersdorff D
    Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1212-8. PubMed ID: 16933199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Targeted Biopsies Noninferior to Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Systematic Biopsies for the Detection of Prostate Cancer?
    Delongchamps NB; Portalez D; Bruguière E; Rouvière O; Malavaud B; Mozer P; Fiard G; Cornud F;
    J Urol; 2016 Oct; 196(4):1069-75. PubMed ID: 27079582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transperineal prostate biopsy under magnetic resonance image guidance: a needle placement accuracy study.
    Blumenfeld P; Hata N; DiMaio S; Zou K; Haker S; Fichtinger G; Tempany CM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):688-94. PubMed ID: 17729363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sixteen gauge needles improve specimen quality but not cancer detection rate in transrectal ultrasound-guided 10-core prostate biopsies.
    Inal GH; Oztekin VC; Uğurlu O; Kosan M; Akdemir O; Cetinkaya M
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2008; 11(3):270-3. PubMed ID: 18521101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
    Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China.
    Zhang Q; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Fu Y; Li D; Guo S; Zhang S; Huang H; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 28005230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First report of robot-assisted transperineal fusion versus off-target biopsy in patients undergoing repeat prostate biopsy.
    Kaufmann S; Mischinger J; Amend B; Rausch S; Adam M; Scharpf M; Fend F; Kramer U; Notohamiprodjo M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kruck S
    World J Urol; 2017 Jul; 35(7):1023-1029. PubMed ID: 27847972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.