These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24935810)
21. Revisiting the global effect and inhibition of return. De Vries JP; Van der Stigchel S; Hooge IT; Verstraten FA Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2999-3009. PubMed ID: 27377069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cortical expressions of inhibition of return. Prime DJ; Ward LM Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1072(1):161-74. PubMed ID: 16445889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A short-lived face alert during inhibition of return. Weaver MD; Aronsen D; Lauwereyns J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):510-20. PubMed ID: 22205613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Voluntary spatial attention induces spatial facilitation and object-centered suppression. Lin Z J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):968-82. PubMed ID: 24364702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Saccade preparation is required for exogenous attention but not endogenous attention or IOR. Smith DT; Schenk T; Rorden C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1438-47. PubMed ID: 22428677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Location- and object-based inhibition of return are affected by different kinds of working memory. Chou WL; Yeh SL Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008; 61(12):1761-8. PubMed ID: 18609392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Examining the influence of a spatially irrelevant working memory load on attentional allocation. McDonnell GP; Dodd MD J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):933-40. PubMed ID: 23477696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. No single electrophysiological marker for facilitation and inhibition of return: A review. Martín-Arévalo E; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J Behav Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 300():1-10. PubMed ID: 26643119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms. Santangelo V; Van der Lubbe RH; Belardinelli MO; Postma A Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 16489435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Is saccade preparation required for inhibition of return (IOR)? Michalczyk Ł; Paszulewicz J; Bielas J; Wolski P Neurosci Lett; 2018 Feb; 665():13-17. PubMed ID: 29154861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Müller HJ; von Mühlenen A Percept Psychophys; 1996 Feb; 58(2):224-49. PubMed ID: 8838166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Objects do not aid inhibition of return in crossing the vertical meridian. Weger UW; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J Psychol Res; 2008 Mar; 72(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 17115222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cue and target processing modulate the onset of inhibition of return. Gabay S; Chica AB; Charras P; Funes MJ; Henik A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21553993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias. Shafer-Skelton A; Kupitz CN; Golomb JD Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr; 79(3):765-781. PubMed ID: 28070793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effects of implicit attentional learning and habituation on inhibition of return. Wolf K; Ebeling D; Müller NG Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):26-41. PubMed ID: 19304594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Peripheral cues and gaze direction jointly focus attention and inhibition of return. Hudson M; Skarratt PA Cogn Neurosci; 2016; 7(1-4):67-73. PubMed ID: 26257306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Saccade trajectory deviations and inhibition-of-return: Measuring the amount of attentional processing. Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1307-15. PubMed ID: 18723045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Structure-based modulation of inhibition of return is triggered by object-internal but not occluding shape features. Reppa I; Charles Leek E Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Nov; 59(11):1857-66. PubMed ID: 16987777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]