BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24935843)

  • 1. [A clinical retrospective analysis of dental implants replaced in previously failed sites].
    He J; Shang YW; Deng CF; Shang DH; Zhang C; Wang DN; Zhao BH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2014 Apr; 23(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 24935843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dental implants placed in previously failed sites: survival rate and factors affecting the outcome.
    Machtei EE; Mahler D; Oettinger-Barak O; Zuabi O; Horwitz J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 18177430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Success and survival of single dental implants placed in sites of previously failed implants.
    Grossmann Y; Levin L
    J Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 78(9):1670-4. PubMed ID: 17760534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intermediate long-term clinical performance of dental implants placed in sites with a previous early implant failure: a retrospective analysis.
    Wang F; Zhang Z; Monje A; Huang W; Wu Y; Wang G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1443-9. PubMed ID: 25393153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A retrospective analysis of replacing dental implants in previously failed sites.
    Mardinger O; Ben Zvi Y; Chaushu G; Nissan J; Manor Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 22883978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and Retrospective Evaluation of 4.1- or 4.3-mm-Diameter Implants Placed Immediately in the Molar Region: A Preliminary Study.
    Jung DW; Yoon HJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 74(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 26608455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk factors and reoperative survival rate of failed narrow-diameter implants in the maxillary anterior region.
    Yang G; Chen L; Gao Y; Liu H; Dong H; Mou Y
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 22(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 31797552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrospective analysis of 56 edentulous dental arches restored with 344 single-stage implants using an immediate loading fixed provisional protocol: statistical predictors of implant failure.
    Kinsel RP; Liss M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 17974119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Successive Reimplantation of Dental Implants Into Sites of Previous Failure.
    Agari K; Le B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar; 78(3):375-385. PubMed ID: 31705865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A long-term retrospective analysis of survival rates of implants in the mandible.
    Balshi TJ; Wolfinger GJ; Stein BE; Balshi SF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1348-54. PubMed ID: 26574859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective study of short and extra-short implants placed in posterior regions: influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone loss.
    Anitua E; Piñas L; Orive G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 17(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 23656303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases.
    Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a clinical retrospective study of 5-10 years.
    Lai HC; Si MS; Zhuang LF; Shen H; Liu YL; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Feb; 24(2):230-7. PubMed ID: 22469075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Survival of Morse Cone-Connection Implants with Platform Switch.
    Cassetta M; Di Mambro A; Giansanti M; Brandetti G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1031-9. PubMed ID: 27632257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Five-year clinical evaluation of short dental implants placed in posterior areas: a retrospective study.
    Anitua E; Orive G; Aguirre JJ; Andía I
    J Periodontol; 2008 Jan; 79(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18166091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Retrospective Analysis of Dental Implants Replacing Failed Implants in Grafted Maxillary Sinus: A Case Series.
    Manor Y; Chaushu G; Lorean A; Mijiritzky E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1156-60. PubMed ID: 26394354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5-year results.
    Krennmair G; Seemann R; Schmidinger S; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 20369096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results.
    Barone A; Orlando B; Cingano L; Marconcini S; Derchi G; Covani U
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 83(7):836-46. PubMed ID: 22141358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival of dental implants placed in sites of previously failed implants.
    Chrcanovic BR; Kisch J; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1348-1353. PubMed ID: 27743398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 6-year Evaluation of 223 Tapered Dental Implants and associated prosthesis in 92 patients at a University Hospital.
    Nagi SE; Khan FR; Ali R
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Oct; 66(Suppl 3)(10):S33-S35. PubMed ID: 27895348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.