212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24936721)
1. Open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: impact on perioperative complications and predictors from national data.
Sharma V; Meeks JJ
J Urol; 2014 Dec; 192(6):1657-62. PubMed ID: 24936721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Population based analysis of incidence and predictors of open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Weiner AB; Murthy P; Richards KA; Patel SG; Eggener SE
J Urol; 2015 Mar; 193(3):826-31. PubMed ID: 25632850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.
Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.
Trinh QD; Sammon J; Sun M; Ravi P; Ghani KR; Bianchi M; Jeong W; Shariat SF; Hansen J; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Rogers CG; Peabody JO; Montorsi F; Menon M; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):679-85. PubMed ID: 22206800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
Liu JJ; Maxwell BG; Panousis P; Chung BI
Urology; 2013 Sep; 82(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 23876584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Complications and incidences in our first 250 robotic radical prostatectomies].
Pereira Arias JG; Gamarra Quintanilla M; Leibar Tamayo A; Astobieta Odriozola A; Ibarluzea González G
Actas Urol Esp; 2010 May; 34(5):428-39. PubMed ID: 20470715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: the differential effect of regionalization, procedure volume and operative approach.
Sammon JD; Karakiewicz PI; Sun M; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Ghani KR; Bianchi M; Peabody JO; Shariat SF; Perrotte P; Hu JC; Menon M; Trinh QD
J Urol; 2013 Apr; 189(4):1289-94. PubMed ID: 23085052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after open and minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery: experience from Australasia.
Cathcart P; Murphy DG; Moon D; Costello AJ; Frydenberg M
BJU Int; 2011 Apr; 107 Suppl 3():11-9. PubMed ID: 21492370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors associated with the adoption of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States.
Ulmer WD; Prasad SM; Kowalczyk KJ; Gu X; Dodgion C; Lipsitz S; Palapattu GS; Choueiri TK; Hu JC
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):775-80. PubMed ID: 22818134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. da Vinci and Open Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Analysis of Insurance Costs.
Niklas C; Saar M; Berg B; Steiner K; Janssen M; Siemer S; Stöckle M; Ohlmann CH
Urol Int; 2016; 96(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 26159050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Hu JC; Wang Q; Pashos CL; Lipsitz SR; Keating NL
J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(14):2278-84. PubMed ID: 18467718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Prasad SM; Gu X; Lavelle R; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 21074198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety of robotic prostatectomy over time: a national study of in-hospital injury.
Chughtai B; Isaacs AJ; Mao J; Lee R; Te A; Kaplan S; Sedrakyan A
J Endourol; 2015 Feb; 29(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 25026363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. National Trends of Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With an Analysis of Risk Factors for Adverse Perioperative Outcomes.
Pariser JJ; Pearce SM; Patel SG; Bales GT
Urology; 2015 Oct; 86(4):721-5. PubMed ID: 26276574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy surgeon volume.
Choi WW; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; D'Amico AV; Williams SB; Hu JC
Urol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 30(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 20822929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.
Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
