These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24936721)
1. Open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: impact on perioperative complications and predictors from national data. Sharma V; Meeks JJ J Urol; 2014 Dec; 192(6):1657-62. PubMed ID: 24936721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Population based analysis of incidence and predictors of open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Weiner AB; Murthy P; Richards KA; Patel SG; Eggener SE J Urol; 2015 Mar; 193(3):826-31. PubMed ID: 25632850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005. Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Trinh QD; Sammon J; Sun M; Ravi P; Ghani KR; Bianchi M; Jeong W; Shariat SF; Hansen J; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Rogers CG; Peabody JO; Montorsi F; Menon M; Karakiewicz PI Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):679-85. PubMed ID: 22206800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Liu JJ; Maxwell BG; Panousis P; Chung BI Urology; 2013 Sep; 82(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 23876584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Complications and incidences in our first 250 robotic radical prostatectomies]. Pereira Arias JG; Gamarra Quintanilla M; Leibar Tamayo A; Astobieta Odriozola A; Ibarluzea González G Actas Urol Esp; 2010 May; 34(5):428-39. PubMed ID: 20470715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: the differential effect of regionalization, procedure volume and operative approach. Sammon JD; Karakiewicz PI; Sun M; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Ghani KR; Bianchi M; Peabody JO; Shariat SF; Perrotte P; Hu JC; Menon M; Trinh QD J Urol; 2013 Apr; 189(4):1289-94. PubMed ID: 23085052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after open and minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery: experience from Australasia. Cathcart P; Murphy DG; Moon D; Costello AJ; Frydenberg M BJU Int; 2011 Apr; 107 Suppl 3():11-9. PubMed ID: 21492370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors associated with the adoption of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States. Ulmer WD; Prasad SM; Kowalczyk KJ; Gu X; Dodgion C; Lipsitz S; Palapattu GS; Choueiri TK; Hu JC J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):775-80. PubMed ID: 22818134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. da Vinci and Open Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Analysis of Insurance Costs. Niklas C; Saar M; Berg B; Steiner K; Janssen M; Siemer S; Stöckle M; Ohlmann CH Urol Int; 2016; 96(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 26159050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Hu JC; Wang Q; Pashos CL; Lipsitz SR; Keating NL J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(14):2278-84. PubMed ID: 18467718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Prasad SM; Gu X; Lavelle R; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 21074198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety of robotic prostatectomy over time: a national study of in-hospital injury. Chughtai B; Isaacs AJ; Mao J; Lee R; Te A; Kaplan S; Sedrakyan A J Endourol; 2015 Feb; 29(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 25026363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. National Trends of Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With an Analysis of Risk Factors for Adverse Perioperative Outcomes. Pariser JJ; Pearce SM; Patel SG; Bales GT Urology; 2015 Oct; 86(4):721-5. PubMed ID: 26276574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy surgeon volume. Choi WW; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; D'Amico AV; Williams SB; Hu JC Urol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 30(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 20822929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience. Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]