These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24936721)

  • 21. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: do minimally invasive approaches offer significant advantages?
    Smith JA; Herrell SD
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(32):8170-5. PubMed ID: 16278469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of increasing prevalence of minimally invasive prostatectomy on open prostatectomy observed in the national inpatient sample and national surgical quality improvement program.
    Hofer MD; Meeks JJ; Cashy J; Kundu S; Zhao LC
    J Endourol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 22834981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: results from the 100% Medicare sample.
    Kowalczyk KJ; Levy JM; Caplan CF; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Gu X; Hu JC
    Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):803-9. PubMed ID: 22209053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rates and Predictors of Conversion to Open Surgery During Minimally Invasive Radical Cystectomy.
    Ko OS; Weiner AB; Smith ND; Meeks JJ
    J Endourol; 2018 Jun; 32(6):488-494. PubMed ID: 29620960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Practice patterns and outcomes of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy since the introduction of robotic partial nephrectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.
    Ghani KR; Sukumar S; Sammon JD; Rogers CG; Trinh QD; Menon M
    J Urol; 2014 Apr; 191(4):907-12. PubMed ID: 24184365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A population-based analysis of temporal perioperative complication rates after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
    Schmitges J; Trinh QD; Abdollah F; Sun M; Bianchi M; Budäus L; Zorn K; Perotte P; Schlomm T; Haese A; Montorsi F; Menon M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):564-71. PubMed ID: 21723034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Risk of Small Bowel Obstruction After Robot-Assisted vs Open Radical Prostatectomy.
    Loeb S; Meyer CP; Krasnova A; Curnyn C; Reznor G; Kibel AS; Lepor H; Trinh QD
    J Endourol; 2016 Dec; 30(12):1291-1295. PubMed ID: 27615204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Bolenz C; Gupta A; Hotze T; Ho R; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y
    Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
    Humphreys MR; Gettman MT; Chow GK; Zincke H; Blute ML
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2004 Sep; 79(9):1169-80. PubMed ID: 15357040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pretreatment expectations of patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic or open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Schroeck FR; Krupski TL; Stewart SB; Bañez LL; Gerber L; Albala DM; Moul JW
    J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):894-8. PubMed ID: 22245326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy at Ramathibodi Hospital, Thailand: a retrospective review.
    Kongcharoensombat W; Tantirangsee N; Chaimuangraj S; Leelanuphun C; Kochakarn W; Patcharatrakul S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Aug; 95(8):1035-40. PubMed ID: 23061307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of outpatient narcotic prescribing patterns after minimally invasive versus retropubic and perineal radical prostatectomy.
    Kowalczyk KJ; Weinburg AC; Gu X; Yu HY; Lipsitz SR; Williams SB; Hu JC
    J Urol; 2011 Nov; 186(5):1843-8. PubMed ID: 21944990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic.
    Menon M; Shrivastava A; Tewari A
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):101-4. PubMed ID: 16194714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy 2007: the true minimally invasive surgery for localized prostate cancer?
    Nosnik IP; Gan TJ; Moul JW
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2007 Sep; 7(9):1309-17. PubMed ID: 17892432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better?
    Wilson T; Torrey R
    Curr Opin Urol; 2011 May; 21(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 21427586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. National trends and differences in morbidity among surgical approaches for radical prostatectomy in Germany.
    Stolzenburg JU; Kyriazis I; Fahlenbrach C; Gilfrich C; Günster C; Jeschke E; Popken G; Weißbach L; von Zastrow C; Leicht H
    World J Urol; 2016 Nov; 34(11):1515-1520. PubMed ID: 27012711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Assessing nodal yield, perioperative outcomes, and complications.
    Zorn KC; Katz MH; Bernstein A; Shikanov SA; Brendler CB; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
    Urology; 2009 Aug; 74(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 19515403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Variations in surgeon volume and use of pelvic lymph node dissection with open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
    Prasad SM; Keating NL; Wang Q; Pashos CL; Lipsitz S; Richie JP; Hu JC
    Urology; 2008 Sep; 72(3):647-52; discussion 652-3. PubMed ID: 18649928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of 90-day re-admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
    Chung SD; Kelle JJ; Huang CY; Chen YH; Lin HC
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E966-71. PubMed ID: 22540425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.