These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24937162)

  • 1. Propensity scores: a practical method for assessing treatment effects in pain and symptom management research.
    Garrido MM
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2014 Oct; 48(4):711-8. PubMed ID: 24937162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity Score: an Alternative Method of Analyzing Treatment Effects.
    Kuss O; Blettner M; Börgermann J
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2016 Sep; 113(35-36):597-603. PubMed ID: 27658473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RCTs of psychological treatments for chronic pain: progress and challenges.
    Morley S; Williams ACC
    Pain; 2006 Apr; 121(3):171-172. PubMed ID: 16513271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores.
    Garrido MM; Kelley AS; Paris J; Roza K; Meier DE; Morrison RS; Aldridge MD
    Health Serv Res; 2014 Oct; 49(5):1701-20. PubMed ID: 24779867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When does pain matter? Acknowledging the subjectivity of clinical significance.
    Birnie KA; McGrath PJ; Chambers CT
    Pain; 2012 Dec; 153(12):2311-2314. PubMed ID: 22995250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis.
    Qin R; Titler MG; Shever LL; Kim T
    Nurs Res; 2008; 57(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 19018219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Opportunities and limitations of general practice databases in pain research.
    Jordan KP; Croft P
    Pain; 2008 Jul; 137(3):469-470. PubMed ID: 18485597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care.
    Stuart BL; Grebel LE; Butler CC; Hood K; Verheij TJM; Little P
    Br J Gen Pract; 2017 Sep; 67(662):e643-e649. PubMed ID: 28760739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applying propensity score methods in medical research: pitfalls and prospects.
    Luo Z; Gardiner JC; Bradley CJ
    Med Care Res Rev; 2010 Oct; 67(5):528-54. PubMed ID: 20442340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Propensity score to detect baseline imbalance in cluster randomized trials: the role of the c-statistic.
    Leyrat C; Caille A; Foucher Y; Giraudeau B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jan; 16():9. PubMed ID: 26801083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the clinical effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy in the clinic: evaluation of a CBT informed pain management programme.
    Morley S; Williams A; Hussain S
    Pain; 2008 Jul; 137(3):670-680. PubMed ID: 18394806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].
    Pattanayak CW; Rubin DB; Zell ER
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):897-903. PubMed ID: 21872981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity Score Methods for Analyzing Observational Data Like Randomized Experiments: Challenges and Solutions for Rare Outcomes and Exposures.
    Ross ME; Kreider AR; Huang YS; Matone M; Rubin DM; Localio AR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 181(12):989-95. PubMed ID: 25995287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Moving towards multiple site outcomes in spinal cord injury pain clinical trials: An issue of clustered observations in trial design and analysis.
    Richardson E; Redden DT
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2014 May; 37(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 24621021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rectus femoris transfer in children with cerebral palsy: comparing a propensity score-matched observational study to a randomized controlled trial.
    Schwartz MH; Ries AJ
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2021 Feb; 63(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 33084049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response to comments on 'the use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias'.
    Kaizar EE; Vydra TP
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):538-9. PubMed ID: 24395075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias.
    Pressler TR; Kaizar EE
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(20):3552-68. PubMed ID: 23553373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cut points on 0-10 numeric rating scales for symptoms included in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in cancer patients: a systematic review.
    Oldenmenger WH; de Raaf PJ; de Klerk C; van der Rijt CC
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2013 Jun; 45(6):1083-93. PubMed ID: 23017617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cut-points for the measurement of pain: the choice depends on what you want to study.
    Farrar JT
    Pain; 2010 May; 149(2):163-164. PubMed ID: 20347224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.