These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24937676)

  • 1. Strategies to diagnose ovarian cancer: new evidence from phase 3 of the multicentre international IOTA study.
    Testa A; Kaijser J; Wynants L; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Vergote I; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Calster B; Timmerman D
    Br J Cancer; 2014 Aug; 111(4):680-8. PubMed ID: 24937676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX: a Portuguese multicenter study.
    Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training.
    Sayasneh A; Wynants L; Preisler J; Kaijser J; Johnson S; Stalder C; Husicka R; Abdallah Y; Raslan F; Drought A; Smith AA; Ghaem-Maghami S; Epstein E; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(12):2448-54. PubMed ID: 23674083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective evaluation of IOTA logistic regression models LR1 and LR2 in comparison with subjective pattern recognition for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an outpatient setting.
    Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):829-835. PubMed ID: 28976616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
    Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple descriptors and simple rules of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group: a prospective study of combined use for the description of adnexal masses.
    Peces Rama A; Llanos Llanos MC; Sánchez Ferrer ML; Alcázar Zambrano JL; Martínez Mendoza A; Nieto Díaz A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Dec; 195():7-11. PubMed ID: 26461961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective validation of the IOTA logistic regression models (LR1 and LR2) in comparison to subjective pattern recognition for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
    Nunes N; Ambler G; Hoo WL; Naftalin J; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Nov; 23(9):1583-9. PubMed ID: 24088790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Meys EM; Kaijser J; Kruitwagen RF; Slangen BF; Van Calster B; Aertgeerts B; Verbakel JY; Timmerman D; Van Gorp T
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 58():17-29. PubMed ID: 26922169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multicenter prospective external validation of the diagnostic performance of IOTA simple descriptors and rules to characterize ovarian masses.
    Sayasneh A; Kaijser J; Preisler J; Johnson S; Stalder C; Husicka R; Guha S; Naji O; Abdallah Y; Raslan F; Drought A; Smith AA; Fotopoulou C; Ghaem-Maghami S; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 130(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 23578539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving strategies for diagnosing ovarian cancer: a summary of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies.
    Kaijser J; Bourne T; Valentin L; Sayasneh A; Van Holsbeke C; Vergote I; Testa AC; Franchi D; Van Calster B; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 41(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 23065859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinically oriented three-step strategy for assessment of adnexal pathology.
    Ameye L; Timmerman D; Valentin L; Paladini D; Zhang J; Van Holsbeke C; Lissoni AA; Savelli L; Veldman J; Testa AC; Amant F; Van Huffel S; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 22511559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kaijser J; Sayasneh A; Van Hoorde K; Ghaem-Maghami S; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
    Hum Reprod Update; 2014; 20(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 24327552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Prospective External Validation of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules in the Hands of Level I and II Examiners.
    Knafel A; Banas T; Nocun A; Wiechec M; Jach R; Ludwin A; Kabzinska-Turek M; Pietrus M; Pitynski K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Oct; 37(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 26126150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
    Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving diagnostic strategies for ovarian cancer in Filipino women using ultrasound imaging and a multivariate index assay.
    Velayo CL; Reforma KN; Sicam RVG; Diwa MH; Sy ADR; Tantengco OAG
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 81():102253. PubMed ID: 36179631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of the IOTA SRR and LR2 scoring systems for discriminating between malignant and Benign Adnexal masses by junior physicians in Chinese patients: a retrospective observational study.
    Tian C; Wen SB; Zhao CY; Yan XN; Du JX
    BMC Womens Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 37940895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
    Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.