These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24939261)

  • 41. Predicting tooth-size discrepancy: A new formula utilizing revised landmarks and 3-dimensional laser scanning technology.
    Bailey E; Nelson G; Miller AJ; Andrews L; Johnson E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):574-85. PubMed ID: 23561420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of normal permanent and primary dentition sagittal tooth-crown inclinations of Japanese females.
    Inada E; Saitoh I; Hayasaki H; Iwase Y; Kubota N; Takemoto Y; Yamasaki Y
    Cranio; 2012 Jan; 30(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 22435176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Three-dimensional analysis of craniofacial growth in adolescents with normal occlusion in Beijing].
    Gao WM; Liang SR; Bai YX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 47(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 23328099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Craniofacial morphology of wind and string instrument players: a cephalometric study.
    Clemente MP; Mendes J; Moreira A; Ferreira AP; Amarante JM
    BMC Med Imaging; 2020 May; 20(1):57. PubMed ID: 32456620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Classification of maxillary central incisors-implications for immediate implant in the esthetic zone.
    Lau SL; Chow J; Li W; Chow LK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 69(1):142-53. PubMed ID: 21050638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
    Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco AA; Crincoli V; Debernardi CL; Bracco P
    Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Diagnostic model of anterior open bite--a new way to predict skeletal type: a cross-sectional study.
    Urzal V; Braga AC; Ferreira AP
    Int Orthod; 2014 Sep; 12(3):358-70. PubMed ID: 25087172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cephalometric norms for Bunt and Brahmin children of Dakshina Kannada based on McNamara's analysis.
    Bhat M; Sudha P; Tandon S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Jun; 19(2):41-51. PubMed ID: 11692821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Upper incisor position and bony support in untreated patients as seen on CBCT.
    Gracco A; Lombardo L; Mancuso G; Gravina V; Siciliani G
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jul; 79(4):692-702. PubMed ID: 19537878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Gender differences in the form of maxillary central incisors analyzed using AutoCAD software.
    Brunetto J; Becker MM; Volpato CA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 21821163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluating the Association of Tooth Form of Maxillary Central Incisors with Face Shape Using AutoCAD Software: A Descriptive Study.
    Mehndiratta A; Bembalagi M; Patil R
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e469-e472. PubMed ID: 29280304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The relationship between the incisor position and lingual surface morphology in normal occlusion.
    Hasegawa Y; Ezura A; Nomintsetseg B
    Odontology; 2017 Jan; 105(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 27011328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Critical assessment of a device to measure incisor crown inclination.
    Ghahferokhi AE; Elias L; Jonsson S; Rolfe B; Richmond S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Feb; 121(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 11840133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Biometric ratio in estimating widths of maxillary anterior teeth derived after correlating anthropometric measurements with dental measurements.
    Kini AY; Angadi GS
    Gerodontology; 2013 Jun; 30(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 22540845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reliability and validity of MicroScribe-3DXL system in comparison with radiographic cephalometric system: Angular measurements.
    Barmou MM; Hussain SF; Abu Hassan MI
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):314-327. PubMed ID: 29673688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Alveolar bone mapping in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions.
    Sadek MM; Sabet NE; Hassan IT
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 25114124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Inclination of crown and tooth longitudinal axis in cephalometric analysis of normal occlusions].
    Xu L; Jing R; Xianrui Y; Li W
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Dec; 34(6):606-610. PubMed ID: 28318162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A study of labial groove-textures of upper central incisors by Shadow Moiré technology.
    Zhang R; Wu Y; Zhu ZL; Zhang DS; Wang F; Yi X; Yu HY
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):501-8. PubMed ID: 20337869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Facial pattern and anterior apical base.
    Luder HU
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jan; 56(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 3456735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.