193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24941936)
1. CT versus FDG-PET/CT response evaluation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.
Skougaard K; Johannesen HH; Nielsen D; Schou JV; Jensen BV; Høgdall EV; Hendel HW
Cancer Med; 2014 Oct; 3(5):1294-301. PubMed ID: 24941936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST for PET/CT response evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.
Skougaard K; Nielsen D; Jensen BV; Hendel HW
J Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 54(7):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23572497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early
Skougaard K; Nielsen D; Jensen BV; Pfeiffer P; Hendel HW
Acta Oncol; 2016; 55(9-10):1175-1182. PubMed ID: 27548393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phase II study of combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan for wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines.
Shitara K; Yuki S; Yoshida M; Takahari D; Utsunomiya S; Yokota T; Sato Y; Inaba Y; Tajika M; Kawai H; Yamaura H; Kato M; Yamazaki K; Komatsu Y; Muro K
Invest New Drugs; 2012 Apr; 30(2):787-93. PubMed ID: 21174225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Second-line cetuximab/irinotecan versus oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidines for metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS.
Hong YS; Kim HJ; Park SJ; Kim KP; Lee JL; Park JH; Kim JH; Lim SB; Yu CS; Kim JC; Baek JY; Kim SY; Kim TW
Cancer Sci; 2013 Apr; 104(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 23298313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phase II trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan for oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy-refractory patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of efficacy and safety based on KRAS mutation status (T-CORE0801).
Soeda H; Shimodaira H; Gamoh M; Ando H; Isobe H; Suto T; Takahashi S; Kakudo Y; Amagai K; Mori T; Watanabe M; Yamaguchi T; Kato S; Ishioka C
Oncology; 2014; 87(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 24968756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PTEN expression and KRAS mutations on primary tumors and metastases in the prediction of benefit from cetuximab plus irinotecan for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Loupakis F; Pollina L; Stasi I; Ruzzo A; Scartozzi M; Santini D; Masi G; Graziano F; Cremolini C; Rulli E; Canestrari E; Funel N; Schiavon G; Petrini I; Magnani M; Tonini G; Campani D; Floriani I; Cascinu S; Falcone A
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jun; 27(16):2622-9. PubMed ID: 19398573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The importance of KRAS mutations and EGF61A>G polymorphism to the effect of cetuximab and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Garm Spindler KL; Pallisgaard N; Rasmussen AA; Lindebjerg J; Andersen RF; Crüger D; Jakobsen A
Ann Oncol; 2009 May; 20(5):879-84. PubMed ID: 19179548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of simvastatin plus cetuximab/irinotecan for KRAS mutant colorectal cancer and predictive value of the RAS signature for treatment response to cetuximab.
Lee J; Hong YS; Hong JY; Han SW; Kim TW; Kang HJ; Kim TY; Kim KP; Kim SH; Do IG; Kim KM; Sohn I; Park SH; Park JO; Lim HY; Cho YB; Lee WY; Yun SH; Kim HC; Park YS; Kang WK
Invest New Drugs; 2014 Jun; 32(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 24468885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bevacizumab in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan after failure of cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Larsen FO; Pfeiffer P; Nielsen D; Skougaard K; Qvortrup C; Vistisen K; Fromm AL; Jørgensen TL; Bjerregaard JK; Hoegdall E; Jensen BV
Acta Oncol; 2011 May; 50(4):574-7. PubMed ID: 21529301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcome of Japanese metastatic colorectal cancer patients harbouring the KRAS p.G13D mutation treated with cetuximab + irinotecan.
Bando H; Yoshino T; Yuki S; Shinozaki E; Nishina T; Kadowaki S; Yamazaki K; Kajiura S; Tsuchihara K; Fujii S; Yamanaka T; Ohtsu A
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 42(12):1146-51. PubMed ID: 23071293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The predictive value of 18F-FDG-PET early evaluation in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy plus cetuximab.
Di Fabio F; Pinto C; Rojas Llimpe FL; Fanti S; Castellucci P; Longobardi C; Mutri V; Funaioli C; Sperandi F; Giaquinta S; Martoni AA
Gastric Cancer; 2007; 10(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 18095077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of KRAS mutations in predicting the efficacy of cetuximab-plus-irinotecan therapy in irinotecan-refractory Korean metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Sohn BS; Kim TW; Lee JL; Ryu MH; Chang HM; Kang YK; Park HS; Na YS; Jang SJ; Kim JC; Lee JS
Oncology; 2009; 77(3-4):224-30. PubMed ID: 19738388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy for patients with irinotecan-refractory and KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer according to epidermal growth factor receptor expression status.
Kang MJ; Hong YS; Kim KP; Kim SY; Baek JY; Ryu MH; Lee JL; Chang HM; Kim MJ; Chang HJ; Kang YK; Kim TW
Invest New Drugs; 2012 Aug; 30(4):1607-13. PubMed ID: 21706149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative cell-free DNA, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in plasma from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during treatment with cetuximab and irinotecan.
Spindler KL; Pallisgaard N; Vogelius I; Jakobsen A
Clin Cancer Res; 2012 Feb; 18(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 22228631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cetuximab plus irinotecan after irinotecan failure in elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients: clinical outcome according to KRAS and BRAF mutational status.
Fornaro L; Baldi GG; Masi G; Allegrini G; Loupakis F; Vasile E; Cupini S; Stasi I; Salvatore L; Cremolini C; Vincenzi B; Santini D; Tonini G; Graziano F; Ruzzo A; Canestrari E; Magnani M; Falcone A
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 20619672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity to previous irinotecan treatment does not predict the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with cetuximab plus irinotecan for wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Shitara K; Ura T; Matsuo K; Takahari D; Yokota T; Yuki S; Yoshida M; Utsunomiya S; Sato Y; Yamaura H; Kato M; Inaba Y; Tajika M; Kawai H; Yamazaki K; Komatsu Y; Muro K
Eur J Cancer; 2011 Dec; 47(18):2673-80. PubMed ID: 21652203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MDR1 polymorphism role in patients treated with cetuximab and irinotecan in irinotecan refractory colorectal cancer.
Paule B; Castagne V; Picard V; Saffroy R; Adam R; Guettier C; Farinotti R; Bonhomme-Faivre L
Med Oncol; 2010 Dec; 27(4):1066-72. PubMed ID: 19862647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer-subgroup analysis of patients with KRAS: mutated tumours in the randomised German AIO study KRK-0306.
Stintzing S; Fischer von Weikersthal L; Decker T; Vehling-Kaiser U; Jäger E; Heintges T; Stoll C; Giessen C; Modest DP; Neumann J; Jung A; Kirchner T; Scheithauer W; Heinemann V
Ann Oncol; 2012 Jul; 23(7):1693-9. PubMed ID: 22219013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status.
Van Cutsem E; Köhne CH; Láng I; Folprecht G; Nowacki MP; Cascinu S; Shchepotin I; Maurel J; Cunningham D; Tejpar S; Schlichting M; Zubel A; Celik I; Rougier P; Ciardiello F
J Clin Oncol; 2011 May; 29(15):2011-9. PubMed ID: 21502544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
