These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24942247)

  • 1. Manipulability agreement as a predictor of action initiation latency.
    Guérard K; Brodeur MB
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):572-9. PubMed ID: 24942247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Four types of manipulability ratings and naming latencies for a set of 560 photographs of objects.
    Guérard K; Lagacé S; Brodeur MB
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):443-70. PubMed ID: 24903695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Norms for two types of manipulability (graspability and functional usage), familiarity, and age of acquisition for 320 photographs of objects.
    Salmon JP; McMullen PA; Filliter JH
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 20160288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Norms for grip agreement for 296 photographs of objects.
    Lagacé S; Downing-Doucet F; Guérard K
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):772-81. PubMed ID: 23239071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A motor isolation effect: when object manipulability modulates recall performance.
    Guérard K; Lagacé S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(12):2439-54. PubMed ID: 25176227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of motor affordances in immediate and long-term retention of objects.
    Guérard K; Guerrette MC; Rowe VP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():69-75. PubMed ID: 26540141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Embodied object concepts: The contribution of structural and functional manipulability depends on available visual information.
    Matheson HE; Salmon JP; Tougas M; McMullen PA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2018 Dec; 72(4):229-243. PubMed ID: 29847975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No role for motor affordances in visual working memory.
    Pecher D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 22612171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited: norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects, and nonobjects.
    Magnié MN; Besson M; Poncet M; Dolisi C
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Jun; 25(4):521-60. PubMed ID: 12911106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thai Norms for Name, Image, and Category Agreement, Object Familiarity, Visual Complexity, Manipulability, and Age of Acquisition for 480 Color Photographic Objects.
    Clarke AJB; Ludington JD
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):607-626. PubMed ID: 29222768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implied actions between paired objects lead to affordance selection by inhibition.
    Xu S; Humphreys GW; Heinke D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1021-36. PubMed ID: 25961281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of motor congruence on visual working memory.
    Quak M; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):2063-70. PubMed ID: 24599737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERPs Differentially Reflect Automatic and Deliberate Processing of the Functional Manipulability of Objects.
    Madan CR; Chen YY; Singhal A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():360. PubMed ID: 27536224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of the motor system in conceptual processing: effects of object affordances beyond response interference.
    Vankov I; Kokinov B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 May; 143(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 23507471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing the embodied account of object naming: a concurrent motor task affects naming artifacts and animals.
    Matheson HE; White N; McMullen PA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():33-43. PubMed ID: 24291119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conflict in the kitchen: Contextual modulation of responsiveness to affordances.
    Wokke ME; Knot SL; Fouad A; Richard Ridderinkhof K
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Feb; 40():141-6. PubMed ID: 26821243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Boronat CB; Buxbaum LJ; Coslett HB; Tang K; Saffran EM; Kimberg DY; Detre JA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):361-73. PubMed ID: 15820643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Location-coding account versus affordance-activation account in handle-to-hand correspondence effects: Evidence of Simon-like effects based on the coding of action direction.
    Pellicano A; Koch I; Binkofski F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1647-1666. PubMed ID: 28414500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of object affordances and center of gravity in eye movements toward isolated daily-life objects.
    van der Linden L; Mathôt S; Vitu F
    J Vis; 2015; 15(5):8. PubMed ID: 26067526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensory and semantic activations evoked by action attributes of manipulable objects: Evidence from ERPs.
    Lee CL; Huang HW; Federmeier KD; Buxbaum LJ
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():331-341. PubMed ID: 29183777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.