These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24942459)
1. Cross-species outlier detection reveals different evolutionary pressures between sister species. Cullingham CI; Cooke JEK; Coltman DW New Phytol; 2014 Oct; 204(1):215-229. PubMed ID: 24942459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of introgression on the genetic population structure of two ecologically and economically important conifer species: lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana). Cullingham CI; Cooke JE; Coltman DW Genome; 2013 Oct; 56(10):577-85. PubMed ID: 24237338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcriptome resources and functional characterization of monoterpene synthases for two host species of the mountain pine beetle, lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana). Hall DE; Yuen MM; Jancsik S; Quesada AL; Dullat HK; Li M; Henderson H; Arango-Velez A; Liao NY; Docking RT; Chan SK; Cooke JE; Breuil C; Jones SJ; Keeling CI; Bohlmann J BMC Plant Biol; 2013 May; 13():80. PubMed ID: 23679205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Population structure of a lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and jack pine (P. banksiana) complex as revealed by random amplified polymorphic DNA. Ye TZ; Yang RC; Yeh FC Genome; 2002 Jun; 45(3):530-40. PubMed ID: 12033622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Water-deficit and fungal infection can differentially affect the production of different classes of defense compounds in two host pines of mountain pine beetle. Erbilgin N; Cale JA; Lusebrink I; Najar A; Klutsch JG; Sherwood P; Enrico Bonello P; Evenden ML Tree Physiol; 2017 Mar; 37(3):338-350. PubMed ID: 27881799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterizing the physical and genetic structure of the lodgepole pine × jack pine hybrid zone: mosaic structure and differential introgression. Cullingham CI; James PM; Cooke JE; Coltman DW Evol Appl; 2012 Dec; 5(8):879-91. PubMed ID: 23346232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in defence responses of Pinus contorta and Pinus banksiana to the mountain pine beetle fungal associate Grosmannia clavigera are affected by water deficit. Arango-Velez A; El Kayal W; Copeland CC; Zaharia LI; Lusebrink I; Cooke JE Plant Cell Environ; 2016 Apr; 39(4):726-44. PubMed ID: 26205849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid monoterpene induction promotes the susceptibility of a novel host pine to mountain pine beetle colonization but not to beetle-vectored fungi. Cale JA; Muskens M; Najar A; Ishangulyyeva G; Hussain A; Kanekar SS; Klutsch JG; Taft S; Erbilgin N Tree Physiol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1597-1610. PubMed ID: 28985375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Purifying selection does not drive signatures of convergent local adaptation of lodgepole pine and interior spruce. Lu M; Hodgins KA; Degner JC; Yeaman S BMC Evol Biol; 2019 May; 19(1):110. PubMed ID: 31138118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of water deficit on the molecular responses of Pinus contorta × Pinus banksiana mature trees to infection by the mountain pine beetle fungal associate, Grosmannia clavigera. Arango-Velez A; González LM; Meents MJ; El Kayal W; Cooke BJ; Linsky J; Lusebrink I; Cooke JE Tree Physiol; 2014 Nov; 34(11):1220-39. PubMed ID: 24319029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The lodgepole × jack pine hybrid zone in Alberta, Canada: a stepping stone for the mountain pine beetle on its journey East across the boreal forest? Lusebrink I; Erbilgin N; Evenden ML J Chem Ecol; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1209-20. PubMed ID: 23955061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Linking genotype to phenotype to identify genetic variation relating to host susceptibility in the mountain pine beetle system. Cullingham CI; Peery RM; Fortier CE; Mahon EL; Cooke JEK; Coltman DW Evol Appl; 2020 Jan; 13(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 31892943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of water stress and fungal inoculation on monoterpene emission from an historical and a new pine host of the mountain pine beetle. Lusebrink I; Evenden ML; Blanchet FG; Cooke JE; Erbilgin N J Chem Ecol; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1013-26. PubMed ID: 21874397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic variation of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia, chemical and physical defenses that affect mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae, attack and tree mortality. Ott DS; Yanchuk AD; Huber DP; Wallin KF J Chem Ecol; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1002-12. PubMed ID: 21845434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Climatic adaptation and ecological divergence between two closely related pine species in Southeast China. Zhou Y; Zhang L; Liu J; Wu G; Savolainen O Mol Ecol; 2014 Jul; 23(14):3504-22. PubMed ID: 24935279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Looking for Local Adaptation: Convergent Microevolution in Aleppo Pine ( Ruiz Daniels R; Taylor RS; González-Martínez SC; Vendramin GG; Fady B; Oddou-Muratorio S; Piotti A; Simioni G; Grivet D; Beaumont MA Genes (Basel); 2019 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 31487909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chemical similarity between historical and novel host plants promotes range and host expansion of the mountain pine beetle in a naïve host ecosystem. Erbilgin N; Ma C; Whitehouse C; Shan B; Najar A; Evenden M New Phytol; 2014 Feb; 201(3):940-950. PubMed ID: 24400902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mountain Pine Beetle Dynamics and Reproductive Success in Post-Fire Lodgepole and Ponderosa Pine Forests in Northeastern Utah. Lerch AP; Pfammatter JA; Bentz BJ; Raffa KF PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164738. PubMed ID: 27783632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatially variable natural selection and the divergence between parapatric subspecies of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta, Pinaceae). Eckert AJ; Shahi H; Datwyler SL; Neale DB Am J Bot; 2012 Aug; 99(8):1323-34. PubMed ID: 22837407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]