These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24942597)

  • 1. Emotional content modulates response inhibition and perceptual processing.
    Yang S; Luo W; Zhu X; Broster LS; Chen T; Li J; Luo Y
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Nov; 51(11):1139-46. PubMed ID: 24942597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emotional arousal elicited by irrelevant stimuli affects event-related potentials (ERPs) during response inhibition.
    Zhao D; Lin H; Xie S; Liu Z
    Physiol Behav; 2019 Jul; 206():134-142. PubMed ID: 30954488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overt and covert attention shifts to emotional faces: Combining EEG, eye tracking, and a go/no-go paradigm.
    Kulke L; Brümmer L; Pooresmaeili A; Schacht A
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Aug; 58(8):e13838. PubMed ID: 33983655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of stimulus valence on perceptual processing of facial expressions and subsequent response inhibition.
    Stockdale LA; Morrison RG; Silton RL
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Feb; 57(2):e13467. PubMed ID: 31454096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of valence and arousal on emotional word processing are modulated by concreteness: Behavioral and ERP evidence from a lexical decision task.
    Yao Z; Yu D; Wang L; Zhu X; Guo J; Wang Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Dec; 110():231-242. PubMed ID: 27432482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociable neural effects of stimulus valence and preceding context during the inhibition of responses to emotional faces.
    Schulz KP; Clerkin SM; Halperin JM; Newcorn JH; Tang CY; Fan J
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2821-33. PubMed ID: 19086020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Configural processing of emotional bodies and faces in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Thoma P; Soria Bauser D; Edel MA; Juckel G; Suchan B
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Dec; 42(10):1028-1048. PubMed ID: 33161842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mutual influence between emotional language and inhibitory control processes. Evidence from an event-related potential study.
    Agudelo-Orjuela P; de Vega M; Beltrán D
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Mar; 58(3):e13743. PubMed ID: 33278304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neurocognitive assessment of emotional context sensitivity.
    Myruski S; Bonanno GA; Gulyayeva O; Egan LJ; Dennis-Tiwary TA
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 17(5):1058-1071. PubMed ID: 28828734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention modulates emotional expression processing.
    Wronka E; Walentowska W
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1047-56. PubMed ID: 21332489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early cortical processing of natural and artificial emotional faces differs between lower and higher socially anxious persons.
    Mühlberger A; Wieser MJ; Herrmann MJ; Weyers P; Tröger C; Pauli P
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2009 Jun; 116(6):735-46. PubMed ID: 18784899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic emotion regulation in response inhibition: The temporal dynamics of emotion counter-regulation during a go/no-go task.
    Zhang J; Feng C; Mai X
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1909-1917. PubMed ID: 27565763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural correlates of facial expression processing during a detection task: An ERP study.
    Sun L; Ren J; He W
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174016. PubMed ID: 28350800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emotional conflict in facial expression processing during scene viewing: an ERP study.
    Xu Q; Yang Y; Zhang E; Qiao F; Lin W; Liang N
    Brain Res; 2015 May; 1608():138-46. PubMed ID: 25747865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhanced Nogo-P3 amplitudes of mothers compared with non-mother women during an emotional Go/Nogo task.
    Hayashi S; Wada H; Kim SP; Motomura Y; Higuchi S; Kim YK
    J Physiol Anthropol; 2018 Apr; 37(1):8. PubMed ID: 29609641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impairments of emotional face processing in schizophrenia patients: Evidence from P100, N170 and P300 ERP components in a sample of auditory hallucinators.
    Shah D; Knott V; Baddeley A; Bowers H; Wright N; Labelle A; Smith D; Collin C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():120-134. PubMed ID: 30291891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory-induced emotion modulates processes of response inhibition: an event-related potential study.
    Yu F; Yuan J; Luo YJ
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 18978645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Face-body integration of intense emotional expressions of victory and defeat.
    Wang L; Xia L; Zhang D
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171656. PubMed ID: 28245245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does anxiety impact the neural processing of child faces in mothers of school-aged children? An ERP study using an emotional Go/NoGo task.
    Kungl MT; Rutherford HJ; Heinisch C; Beckmann MW; Fasching PA; Spangler G
    Soc Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 15(5):530-543. PubMed ID: 32662322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERP components associated with an indirect emotional stop signal task in healthy and depressed participants.
    Camfield DA; Burton TK; De Blasio FM; Barry RJ; Croft RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Feb; 124():12-25. PubMed ID: 29278691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.