BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24942598)

  • 1. The importance of being earnest: the role of industry employees in studies about their products.
    Saper CB
    Ann Neurol; 2014 Jun; 75(6):803-4. PubMed ID: 24942598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reply: To PMID 24942598.
    Saper CB
    Ann Neurol; 2015 Feb; 77(2):356. PubMed ID: 25583460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who is helping whom? Manuscript support and transfer of value.
    Wechsler R; Hauser RA; French J;
    Ann Neurol; 2015 Feb; 77(2):353-5. PubMed ID: 25583380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical researchers' ancillary clinical care responsibilities.
    Belsky L; Richardson HS
    BMJ; 2004 Jun; 328(7454):1494-6. PubMed ID: 15205296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The illusion of scientific objectivity and the death of the investigator.
    Richardson ET; Polyakova A
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2012 Feb; 42(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 21752023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conflicts of interest at the NIH--resolving the problem.
    Steinbrook R
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(10):955-7. PubMed ID: 15342801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The performance of China's biomedical innovation: a scientometric analysis.
    Tang X; Du J
    Sci China Life Sci; 2016 Oct; 59(10):1074-1082. PubMed ID: 27437700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research conduct. Lessons of the stem cell scandal.
    Cho MK; McGee G; Magnus D
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):614-5. PubMed ID: 16456065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conflict of interest. Stung by controversy, biomedical groups urge consistent guidelines.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2007 Jul; 317(5837):441. PubMed ID: 17656694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antidote to toxic principal investigators.
    Iwasaki A
    Nat Med; 2020 Apr; 26(4):457. PubMed ID: 32273601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Remember why we work on cancer.
    Garraway L
    Nature; 2017 Mar; 543(7647):613-615. PubMed ID: 28358103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The new Silk Road.
    Chien K; Chien L
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6979):208-9. PubMed ID: 15014508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Last 50 Years: Mismeasurement and Mismanagement Are Impeding Scientific Research.
    Lawrence PA
    Curr Top Dev Biol; 2016; 116():617-31. PubMed ID: 26970645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repetitive, duplicate, and redundant publications: a review for authors and readers.
    Johnson C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Sep; 29(7):505-9. PubMed ID: 16949937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific judgment and the limits of conflict-of-interest policies.
    Elliott KC
    Account Res; 2008; 15(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 18298027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clone star admits lies over eggs.
    Cyranoski D; Check E
    Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7068):536-7. PubMed ID: 16319847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Academic freedom. Thai science agency clamps down on sensitive research.
    Stone R
    Science; 2007 Dec; 318(5856):1537-8. PubMed ID: 18063762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Complicity of the Population Health Scientist.
    Galea S
    Milbank Q; 2018 Jun; 96(2):227-230. PubMed ID: 29870115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reactions to the Hwang scandal.
    Kwok LS
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):606-7. PubMed ID: 16459362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research qualifications in medicine: what is the importance?
    Gadit AA
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2008 Feb; 58(2):93-4. PubMed ID: 18333532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.