These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

587 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24943252)

  • 1. Optimizing image quality for pediatric torso computed tomography: the use of advanced iterative reconstruction and wide-detector scanning techniques.
    Buchmann RF; Bruce Greenberg S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):786-9. PubMed ID: 24943252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study.
    Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
    Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) vs. filtered back projection: radiation dose reduction capabilities of wide volume and helical scanning techniques on area-detector CT in a chest phantom study.
    Seki S; Koyama H; Ohno Y; Matsumoto S; Inokawa H; Sugihara N; Sugimura K
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Jun; 57(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 26339037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Performance and Dose Comparison of Filtered Back Projection and Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-dimensional CT Enterography in Children and Young Adults.
    Wallihan DB; Podberesky DJ; Sullivan J; Denson LA; Zhang B; Salisbury SR; Towbin AJ
    Radiology; 2015 Jul; 276(1):233-42. PubMed ID: 25654668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation dose reduction in cardiovascular CT angiography with iterative reconstruction (AIDR 3D) in a swine model: a model of paediatric cardiac imaging.
    Zhao P; Hou Y; Liu Q; Ma Y; Guo Q
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Jul; 71(7):716.e7-716.e14. PubMed ID: 27180082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques.
    Padole A; Singh S; Ackman JB; Wu C; Do S; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Otrakji A; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 25247943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Loader RJ; Mitchell GR; Riordan RD; Roobottom CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 23436843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improvements to image quality using hybrid and model-based iterative reconstructions: a phantom study.
    Aurumskjöld ML; Ydström K; Tingberg A; Söderberg M
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26924832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D and filtered back projection in craniocervical CT angiography.
    Yu S; Zhang L; Zheng J; Xu Y; Chen Y; Song Z
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):96.e1-96.e6. PubMed ID: 27647546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Shenoy-Bhangle AS; Saini A; Gervais DA; Westra SJ; Thrall JH
    Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 22517962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hybrid Type iterative reconstruction method vs. filter back projection method: Capability for radiation dose reduction and perfusion assessment on dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced perfusion chest area-detector CT.
    Ohno Y; Koyama H; Fujisawa Y; Yoshikawa T; Inokawa H; Sugihara N; Seki S; Sugimura K
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):164-175. PubMed ID: 26724662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Abdominopelvic CT Using Iterative (AIDR 3D) and Conventional Reconstructions.
    Mello-Amoedo CD; Martins AN; Tachibana A; Pinho DF; Baroni RH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):127-133. PubMed ID: 29140117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-Dose Pelvic Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3-Dimensional Algorithm: A Phantom Study.
    Onishi H; Kockelkoren R; Kim T; Hori M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Uranishi A; Tanaka T; Taniguchi A; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 26125298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D versus filtered back projection in CT: evaluation of image quality.
    Joemai RM; Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Dec; 201(6):1291-7. PubMed ID: 24261369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.
    Gervaise A; Osemont B; Louis M; Lecocq S; Teixeira P; Blum A
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Jan; 95(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23988483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Successful Dose Reduction Using Reduced Tube Voltage With Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction in Pediatric Abdominal CT.
    Berlin SC; Weinert DM; Vasavada PS; Martinez-Rios C; Parikh RA; Wien MA; Jordan DW; Novak RD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):392-9. PubMed ID: 26204293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-dose, wide-detector array thoracic aortic CT angiography using an iterative reconstruction technique results in improved image quality with lower noise and fewer artifacts.
    Rajiah P; Schoenhagen P; Mehta D; Ivanc T; Lieber M; Soufan K; Desai M; Flamm SD; Halliburton S
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(3):205-13. PubMed ID: 22612906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.