These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24943408)

  • 21. Randomized controlled trial comparing Merocel and RapidRhino packing in the management of anterior epistaxis.
    Badran K; Malik TH; Belloso A; Timms MS
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 30(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 16209675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparative study on nasal packing after septoplasty: does it matter in terms of patient comfort, bleeding, and crust or synechia formation?
    Özbal Koç AE; Türkoğlu Babakurban S; Kibar SS; Büyüklü F
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2016; 26(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 27107601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A case-controlled, retrospective, comparative study on the use of biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam versus polyvinyl acetate sponge after nasal fracture reduction.
    Jeong HS; Lee HK; Kim HS; Moon MS; Tark KC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 43(6):717-21. PubMed ID: 24613644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of polyvinyl acetal sponge nasal packing on post-operative care of nasal polyposis patients: a randomised, controlled, partly blinded study.
    Saedi B; Sadeghi M; Farschi S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Apr; 126(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 22310061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of three different polyvinyl alcohol packs following functional endoscopic Nasal surgery.
    Melis A; Karligkiotis A; Bozzo C; Machouchas N; Volpi L; Castiglia P; Castelnuovo P; Meloni F
    Laryngoscope; 2015 May; 125(5):1067-71. PubMed ID: 25545810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An evaluation of biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam in patients following septoplasty: a prospective randomized trial.
    Yilmaz MS; Guven M; Elicora SS; Kaymaz R
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jan; 148(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 23112275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Removing intranasal splints after septal surgery.
    Aksoy E; Serin GM; Polat S; Kaytaz A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):1008-9. PubMed ID: 21558898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of nasal pack removal on patients' anxiety after septoplasty.
    Şahin C; İmer Aras H
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2015; 25(5):266-70. PubMed ID: 26476513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using Surgicel-wrapped Merocel to reduce pain during the removal of nasal packing.
    Lo WL; Yeh CF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2023; 143(11-12):984-988. PubMed ID: 38134221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimal time for intranasal splint removal after septoplasty: a prospective clinical study.
    Ozdogan F; Ozel HE; Esen E; Yuce T; Eyisarac S; Genc S; Selcuk A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 273(10):3203-6. PubMed ID: 27015667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nasal packing for epistaxis: two methods compared.
    Saab M; Randall PE
    Eur J Emerg Med; 1997 Mar; 4(1):44. PubMed ID: 9152696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Early operative intervention versus conventional treatment in epistaxis: randomized prospective trial.
    Moshaver A; Harris JR; Liu R; Diamond C; Seikaly H
    J Otolaryngol; 2004 Jun; 33(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 15841998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of the time of intranasal splinting on bacterial colonization, postoperative complications, and patient discomfort after septoplasty operations.
    Karatas A; Pehlivanoglu F; Salviz M; Kuvat N; Cebi IT; Dikmen B; Sengoz G
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016; 82(6):654-661. PubMed ID: 26923831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of septoplasty and per-operative antibiotic prophylaxis on nasal flora.
    Karaman E; Alimoglu Y; Aygun G; Kilic E; Yagiz C
    B-ENT; 2012; 8(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 22545385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparative study on packing with or without Merocel after endoscopic sinus surgery].
    Chen X; Shi Z; Li X; Shan B; Xue T; Qiao L; Chen F
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 50(10):854-7. PubMed ID: 26696482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. "Double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing Merocel with Rapid Rhino nasal packs after routine nasal surgery".
    Ho WK
    Rhinology; 2004 Dec; 42(4):255; author reply 255. PubMed ID: 15626265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is nonabsorbable nasal packing after septoplasty essential? A meta-analysis.
    Kim JS; Kwon SH
    Laryngoscope; 2017 May; 127(5):1026-1031. PubMed ID: 27900768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effectiveness of Synthetic Polyurethane Foam as a Nasal Packing Material in Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy.
    Lee J; Lee H; Lee HK; Chang M; Park M; Baek S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2207-11. PubMed ID: 26468811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nasal septal packing: which one?
    Acıoğlu E; Edizer DT; Yiğit Ö; Onur F; Alkan Z
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jul; 269(7):1777-81. PubMed ID: 22160143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of surface properties of Merocel® (polyvinyl acetal) and silicone nasal splints on biofilm formation.
    Dag I; Acar M; Sakallioglu O; Catli T; San T; Cingi C
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jun; 271(6):1519-24. PubMed ID: 24065190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.