176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24943861)
41. Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK.
Blum IR; Younis N; Wilson NH
J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():66-72. PubMed ID: 27988345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Restorative treatment decisions of Croatian university teachers.
Baraba A; Doméjean S; Jurić H; Espelid I; Tveit AB; Anić I
Coll Antropol; 2012 Dec; 36(4):1293-9. PubMed ID: 23390824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 4: clinical factor.
Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong R
Aust Dent J; 2017 Sep; 62(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28437002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Clinicians' choices of restorative materials for children.
Tran LA; Messer LB
Aust Dent J; 2003 Dec; 48(4):221-32. PubMed ID: 14738124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. General dentists', pediatric dentists', and endodontists' diagnostic assessment and treatment strategies for deep carious lesions: A comparative analysis.
Koopaeei MM; Inglehart MR; McDonald N; Fontana M
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Feb; 148(2):64-74. PubMed ID: 27986266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland.
Forss H; Widström E
Acta Odontol Scand; 2001 Apr; 59(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 11370750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Restorative thresholds for primary and permanent molars in children: French dentist decisions.
Muller-Bolla M; Aïem E; Coulot C; Velly AM; Doméjean S
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2021 May; 31(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 33220074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Microconservative restorations for approximal carious lesions.
Hunt PR
J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 2404042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Radiographic criteria employed to diagnose and treat approximal caries by final-year dental students in Mexico City.
Maupomé G; Sheiham A
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1997 Jun; 25(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 9192155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Restorative material choices for extensive carious lesions and hypomineralisation defects in children: a questionnaire survey among Finnish dentists.
Wuollet E; Tseveenjav B; Furuholm J; Waltimo-Sirén J; Valen H; Mulic A; Ansteinsson V; Uhlen MM
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2020 Mar; 21(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 32183525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Restorative treatment thresholds reported to be used by dentists in Scotland.
Nuttall NM; Pitts NB
Br Dent J; 1990 Sep; 169(5):119-26. PubMed ID: 2206665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Composites and amalgam.
Hiltunen NS
J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Nov; 142(11):1232-3; author reply 1233-4. PubMed ID: 22041404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Occlusal tooth surface treatment plans and their possible effects on oral health care costs.
Mialhe FL; Pereira AC; Meneghim Mde C; Tagliaferro EP; Pardi V
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2009; 7(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 19780427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Restorative treatment for initial, cavitated and gross coronal carious lesions.
Brennan DS; Balasubramanian M; Spencer AJ
Aust Dent J; 2016 Sep; 61(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 26589576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Restorative service patterns in Australia: amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer restorations.
Brennan DS; Spencer AJ
Int Dent J; 2003 Dec; 53(6):455-63. PubMed ID: 14725373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Surface characteristics and lesion depth and activity of suspicious occlusal carious lesions: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
Makhija SK; Shugars DA; Gilbert GH; Litaker MS; Bader JD; Schaffer R; Gordan VV; Rindal DB; Pihlstrom DJ; Mungia R; Meyerowitz C;
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):922-929. PubMed ID: 29055504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Decision making and management of root caries: A practice-based survey.
Niemeyer SH; Boss Y; Maniewicz S; Campus G; Tennert C; Carvalho TS; Wierichs RJ
J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105062. PubMed ID: 38762078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Variation in radiographic interpretation and restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries among dentists in Norway.
Espelid I; Tveit A; Haugejorden O; Riordan PJ
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1985 Feb; 13(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 3855730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Direct restorative material use of selected practitioners in the United Kingdom.
Brunton PA; Hickel R; Wilson NH
Prim Dent Care; 2002 Oct; 9(4):133-7. PubMed ID: 12483789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Short communication: a pan-European comparison of the management of carious primary molar teeth by postgraduates in paediatric dentistry.
Foley JI
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2012 Feb; 13(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 22293105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
