These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24943877)
1. Systematic review of methods for individual patient data meta- analysis with binary outcomes. Thomas D; Radji S; Benedetti A BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():79. PubMed ID: 24943877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study. Belias M; Rovers MM; Reitsma JB; Debray TPA; IntHout J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):183. PubMed ID: 31477023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. IPDmada: An R Shiny tool for analyzing and visualizing individual patient data meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy. Wang J; Keusters WR; Wen L; Leeflang MMG Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jan; 12(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 32808437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice. Simmonds MC; Higgins JP; Stewart LA; Tierney JF; Clarke MJ; Thompson SG Clin Trials; 2005; 2(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 16279144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A decade of individual participant data meta-analyses: A review of current practice. Simmonds M; Stewart G; Stewart L Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):76-83. PubMed ID: 26091948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-stage random effects meta-analysis using linear mixed models for aggregate continuous outcome data. Papadimitropoulou K; Stijnen T; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):360-375. PubMed ID: 30523676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Introduction to Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis. Veroniki AA; Seitidis G; Tsivgoulis G; Katsanos AH; Mavridis D Neurology; 2023 Jun; 100(23):1102-1110. PubMed ID: 36797070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Individual participant data meta-analysis of intervention studies with time-to-event outcomes: A review of the methodology and an applied example. de Jong VMT; Moons KGM; Riley RD; Tudur Smith C; Marson AG; Eijkemans MJC; Debray TPA Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):148-168. PubMed ID: 31759339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis. Johara FT; Benedetti A; Platt R; Menzies D; Viiklepp P; Schaaf S; Chan E BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):257. PubMed ID: 34814845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Empirical comparison of subgroup effects in conventional and individual patient data meta-analyses. Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Hoes AW; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 18601805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual participant data meta-analysis for a binary outcome: one-stage or two-stage? Debray TP; Moons KG; Abo-Zaid GM; Koffijberg H; Riley RD PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60650. PubMed ID: 23585842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methods and characteristics of published network meta-analyses using individual patient data: protocol for a scoping review. Veroniki AA; Soobiah C; Tricco AC; Elliott MJ; Straus SE BMJ Open; 2015 Apr; 5(4):e007103. PubMed ID: 25926144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ. Burke DL; Ensor J; Riley RD Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(5):855-875. PubMed ID: 27747915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual participant data meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies: state of the art? Abo-Zaid G; Sauerbrei W; Riley RD BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Apr; 12():56. PubMed ID: 22530717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of methods for fixed effects meta-analysis of individual patient data with time to event outcomes. Tudur Smith C; Williamson PR Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):621-30. PubMed ID: 18042571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying heterogeneity in individual participant data meta-analysis with binary outcomes. Chen B; Benedetti A Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):243. PubMed ID: 29208048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: Using pseudo IPD created from aggregate data to adjust for baseline imbalance and assess treatment-by-baseline modification. Papadimitropoulou K; Stijnen T; Riley RD; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):780-794. PubMed ID: 32643264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjusting for misclassification of an exposure in an individual participant data meta-analysis. de Jong VMT; Campbell H; Maxwell L; Jaenisch T; Gustafson P; Debray TPA Res Synth Methods; 2023 Mar; 14(2):193-210. PubMed ID: 36200133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: a review of the methodology. Debray TP; Moons KG; van Valkenhoef G; Efthimiou O; Hummel N; Groenwold RH; Reitsma JB; Res Synth Methods; 2015 Dec; 6(4):293-309. PubMed ID: 26287812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Thomas D; Platt R; Benedetti A BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28202011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]