These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24944105)
1. Reward associations and spatial probabilities produce additive effects on attentional selection. Stankevich BA; Geng JJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2315-25. PubMed ID: 24944105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategic top-down control versus attentional bias by previous reward history. Lynn J; Shin M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2207-16. PubMed ID: 26041273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation. Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture. Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search. Geng JJ; Behrmann M Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1252-68. PubMed ID: 16502846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The salience of a reward cue can outlast reward devaluation. De Tommaso M; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 131(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 28471221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Where is the chocolate? Rapid spatial orienting toward stimuli associated with primary rewards. Pool E; Brosch T; Delplanque S; Sander D Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):348-59. PubMed ID: 24389311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory attentional selection is biased by reward cues. Asutay E; Västfjäll D Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():36989. PubMed ID: 27841363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reward differentially interacts with physical salience in feature-based attention. Gong M; Liu T J Vis; 2018 Oct; 18(11):12. PubMed ID: 30347098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shaping attention with reward: effects of reward on space- and object-based selection. Shomstein S; Johnson J Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2369-78. PubMed ID: 24121412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial distribution of attentional bias in visuo-spatial working memory following multiple cues. Botta F; Lupiáñez J Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():1-13. PubMed ID: 24793127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human prosaccades and antisaccades under risk: effects of penalties and rewards on visual selection and the value of actions. Ross M; Lanyon LJ; Viswanathan J; Manoach DS; Barton JJ Neuroscience; 2011 Nov; 196():168-77. PubMed ID: 21846493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture. Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatio-temporal dynamics of top-down control: directing attention to location and/or color as revealed by ERPs and source modeling. Slagter HA; Kok A; Mol N; Kenemans JL Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):333-48. PubMed ID: 15722205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control. Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reward history but not search history explains value-driven attentional capture. Marchner JR; Preuschhof C Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1436-1448. PubMed ID: 29675555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]